Elijah Barayi, 

 

the NUM, 

 

and the narrative of organisation

 
 
Elijah Barayi was born in 1930 in the town of Cradock, in what is now the
Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. He matriculated in 1951 from
Healdtown, a well-known Methodist educational institution first established
in 1845. 
  
Barayi joined the ANC Youth League in the 1940s and he took part in the
Defiance (Against Unjust Laws) Campaign of the ANC that was started as a
consequence of the banning of the Communist Party (CPSA) in 1950. 
  
By the time of the banning of the ANC (following the Sharpeville Massacre)
in 1960, Elijah Barayi was already a very experienced cadre, working as a
clerk on a mine in Brakpan, East Rand and organising for the ANC. He was
detained for six months during the State of Emergency that followed
Sharpeville. 
  
In May, 1973 Barayi moved to Carletonville on the West Rand. On September
the 11th 1973 (the same day as the Pinochet coup in Chile) 11 striking black
mineworkers were shot dead, an incident known as the Carletonville Massacre.

  
In those days the Anglo American company, born out of financial
consolidation in the early 20th century, was dominant in the industry, and
the employers' principle instrument, as now, was the Chamber of Mines. 

In 1979 the Wiehahn Commission recommended recognition of black trade
unions. 
  
In 1982 the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) was formed with Cyril
Ramaphosa as its first General Secretary and Elijah Barayi as its
Vice-President. 
  
In 1983 the Chamber of Mines recognised the NUM as a collective bargaining
interlocutor. 
  
In December, 1985 COSATU was formed, based largely on the power of the NUM,
with Elijah Barayi as its first President, a position he held until 1991.
Barayi passed away in 1994. COSATU still reveres him, above anyone else, as
its historical father.
  
At the time of the unbanning of the ANC and the SACP in February, 1990,
COSATU had a total membership of about (subject to checking) 800,000 members
organised inside the country, about a third of whom were in the NUM, which
remains COSATU's biggest constituent up to now. 
  
The ANC had by then been banned for 30 years and the SACP for 40 years, so
that they had no members organised in open, legal branches inside the
country. 

By the way, South Africa is a large country, with a population of about 50
million as of now (October 2012). 
  
By the time of its 11th Congress, last month, which I attended as a
delegate, COSATU had 2.2 million members organised in 20 affiliated unions.
This in a national work-force, depending on definition, of 10 to 13 million
employed people. 
  
The SACP, at its 13th Congress in July 2012, announced its membership as
160,000, with an intention to raise this to 500,000, equivalent to one in a
hundred of the total population. This would be a sufficient number to ensure
an organised presence in each voting district, and therefore to be able to
formally constitute the National Democratic Alliance, together with its
other components, at that basic level. With the SACP, these are the
liberation movement (ANC), the union movement (COSATU), and SANCO, which is
the "civics" movement, a historic formation that still has life and meaning
and a useful role to play. 
  
The ANC, a couple of weeks ago, at its audit for the purpose of its 53rd
(and Centenary) National Conference (due to take place in Mangaung in
December) announced that its total membership is currently 1.2 million. 
  
After the ANC, the NUM remains the biggest single democratic
individual-membership organisation in the country, with around 300,000
members. 
  
South Africa's first majority-rule election took place in 1994. It did not
change the dominant relations of production or the general class character
of the state in the country. Unless things are done, constitutional
democracy will normally revert to bourgeois-democratic dictatorship. 
  
Without the existence and constant extension of the mass democratic movement
and general organs of people's power, there will be no prospect of further
advance. Progress will constantly be postponed as one capitalist crisis
follows another, as happens in all bourgeois countries. 
  
The reverse side of this equation, as seen from the point of view of the
bourgeoisie and its supporters, is that the mass democratic movement must be
broken, the alliance of its main components must be broken, and the
democratic life of the country cut back to the national electoral process,
mediated by the mass media that they control. 

Only then will the whole bourgeoisie begin to feel that South Africa has
been made safe for capitalism, according to its own lights. Of course, this
is a mistake. The biggest threat to South African capitalism is capitalist
Imperialism, with its financial terrorists, its sanctions, its drones and
its no-fly zones. 
  
The membership figures can help people to get an idea of the way things
stack up in South Africa. But narrative reference to the likes of Elijah
Barayi are just as necessary in any full account. Communists and
non-communists in "the movement" have made it what it is through the common
conviction that mass democratic organisation is indispensable. Our history,
for us, makes the point much more powerfully than the numbers ever could. 
  
Numbers do have to be increased to the point where organisation stretches
evenly from border to border (i.e. is national) and is as strong at the base
as it is at the centre (revolutionary, or potentially so). 
  
Other mass formations are needed, and most particularly, in my opinion, a
general, democratic, mass-individual-membership organisation for women is
urgently needed as a component of the alliance of equal status with the
others. 
  
Organs of people's power will ensure that the slogan "Power to the People"
can continue to have real meaning. 
  
The operative part of the National Democratic Revolution is the word
"democratic", because democracy is how the people's collective agency is
found. 
  
Going beyond that point will require the invention of new relations of
production, a world-historical task of which South Africa has to be a major
part, if not the main leader. 


Dominic Tweedie, 15 October 2012

 




 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to