UmsebenziOnlineBig.jpg
Reflections from Beijing
The People's Republic of China:
An opportunity for relative delinking from imperialism?
Blade Nzimande, Umsebenzi Online, Johannesburg, 23 July 2015
Each time one visits China one either discovers new things or come back with
new reflections. Hundreds of SACP cadres have visited China especially over
the last 25 years. I visited the People's Republic of China (PRC) for the
first time in 1991 in an SACP delegation led then by the now late Raymond
Mhlaba, Oom Ray, former National Chairperson of our party. Similarly the ANC
has sent many delegations to the PRC over the same period.
This past week I was part of a government delegation to the PRC led by
Deputy President, Cde Cyril Ramaphosa. It was by all accounts a very
successful mission, especially the Beijing leg of the visit, of which I was
part. This visit focused on building upon areas of agreement on co-operation
reached between Presidents Zuma and Xi Jinpin during the former's last state
visit to China last year. Amongst the areas of focus and exchange were the
training of public servants, with a possible co-operation between the
Chinese Academy of Governance and our National School of Government. In
addition, our delegation held a very informative joint seminar with the
Chinese on the role of State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) in the Chinese
economy.
The main meeting between Vice-President Li and Cde Ramaphosa covered a
number of very important areas of co-operation, with a particular focus on
implementation on those areas beyond just what is contained in the
comprehensive strategic relationship between our two countries. Cde Li
pointed out concrete ways of co-operation in supporting South Africa's
industrialisation strategy, including in the areas of infrastructure
development, energy, as well as human resources development.
As I was participating in these meetings I was quietly thinking that,
against the backdrop of the launch of the New Development Bank (BRICS Bank)
established under the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS)
global co-operation, and the potential mutual benefits from this Sino-South
Africa relations, this is one of the major reasons why President Zuma is
such an object of hate by local media and some of its business and
imperialist backers. Dominant sections of our media in particular, if not by
design, but certainly in their discourse and ideological outlook, still sees
South Africa as a 'neo-colonial outpost' of Western capitalist countries. It
is because of the potential of both the BRICS and our relations with China
that we can possibly achieve what our discussion document, 'Going to the
Root', refers to as partial delinking from the Western imperialist economic
centres, thus creating real possibilities for radical economic
transformation in our country.
However, I could also not help reflecting on the fact that we, as the SACP,
have perhaps not fully utilised our relations with China to build the
capacity of the Party in particular. At the very least, we have not
adequately reflected on this relationship and some practical gains we can
make out of it. Maybe our starting point in this regard could be a convening
of a few days' Conference for us to reflect on, amongst others, China and
its economic development trajectory, the role of the Communist Party of
China, and on relations between our two parties and two countries. Such a
conference would also involve our allies and other progressive forces of our
country interested in China, especially in the political and economic
relationship between the PRC and South Africa. Hopefully, out of these
discussions we could come out with concrete actions to enrich and better
benefit mutually from our relations.
Many of the SACP cadres who have visited the PRC over the past two decades
have come back both impressed and concerned about China. They are very
impressed about the level of rapid development of the Chinese economy and
the improvements this has brought about to the millions of Chinese. Of
course the Chinese themselves have warned that we need to temper this
optimism with the reality that there is still significant amounts of poverty
in the PRC, especially in rural areas, and therefore there is still a long
way to go.
Concerns have been raised by our cadres especially about the growth of a
domestic Chinese capitalist class and the counter-revolutionary danger this
may pose to consolidating a socialist China. This is because wherever the
bourgeoisie has emerged and consolidated its place in the economy, it has
always sought to capture political power for itself in order to guarantee
its own reproduction as the ruling class. Of course we have over the years
had very frank, honest, but comradely debates on these matters with our
Communist Party of China (CPC) comrades. They have strongly argued that much
as the path they are traversing since 1978 (when the CPC decided to open its
economy to the outside world), is uniquely Chinese ('Building Socialism with
Chinese Characteristics'), there are important lessons for the communist
movement as a whole in this experience.
Our CPC comrades have argued that perhaps the single most important weakness
of 20th century socialism (including the then actually existing socialism
and its communist theory and strategy), was its primary focus on the
transformation of relations of production (in this case the overthrow of
capitalism and its exploitative relations), often at the expense of adequate
and simultaneous focus on how to grow the productive forces. This weakness
was exaggerated by the fact that socialist revolutions only occurred in
underdeveloped or less developed parts of the world and none in the advanced
capitalist countries, contrary to what Marx and Engels had expected and
predicted. Therefore, the Chinese path is a particular model of building
productive forces for socialism in an underdeveloped country and in the
context of a unipolar world, dominated by neo-liberal capitalism. Indeed
this is an important debate for communists to embark upon, especially on the
question of what constitutes an appropriate socialist strategy after the
collapse of the Soviet Union and in a world where neo-liberalism is in many
respects still dominant, albeit in a crisis as well. It is a debate that
must not be judgmental of the Chinese path, but must seek to learn
appropriate lessons from this 'experiment' for the whole of the communist
movement and other left forces.
There is perhaps another more important lesson from the PRC path of
development. The SOEs made what is perhaps the singularly most important
contribution in the impressive development of the Chinese economy. Some
twelve years after China embarked on this new path of development, we saw
the collapse of the Soviet Union and actually existing socialism in Eastern
Europe, inaugurating an era of neo-liberal triumphalism. Part of this
triumphalism was that there was no alternative other than to allow the
capitalist market to rule and to, amongst things, privatise state owned
enterprises.
The PRC did not follow the neo-liberal prescription of surrendering the SOEs
to private companies. In other words the CPC rejected this aspect of
neo-liberal orthodoxy. Instead it reformed and repositioned SOEs and
mandated them to invest in a particular way that was to see the economy grow
and develop to unprecedented levels. Those countries that privatised their
SOEs never saw any such meaningful socio-economic developments. In many
instances their development was held at ransom by some of the very same
privatised former SOEs.
Between the current crisis of neo-liberalism and the emergence of a power
like China, as well as the potential of BRICS, lies an area of huge
opportunities for a country like ours, including our region and continent.
It is for all this that we need to engage with these new realities from a
consistently Marxist-Leninist perspective in order to drive a second, more
radical phase of our transition. An important part of this struggle is to
defend and protect our national sovereignty as a crucial requirement for
driving this democratic transformation. The SACP, as mandated by its 3rd
Special National Congress, needs to campaign strongly around these themes,
including heightened engagement in the battle of ideas.
Asikhulume!
. Cde Blade Nzimande is SACP General Secretary and Minister of Higher
Education and Training
--
--
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options,
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this
address (repeat): [email protected] .
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
