New Age2.png

 

 

Vavi misjudged his appeal

 

COSATU's special national congress went ahead without doomsayers'
predictions coming to fruition; Vavi's popularity was more the product of
COSATU's collective struggles than his personal engagements.

 

 

Mluleki Dlelanga, The New Age, Johannesburg, 28 July 2015

 

Zwelinzima Vavi, the former COSATU general secretary who had sex in the
office during working hours with a married subordinate and then later
referred to her as a nopatazana (Xhosa for slut), thought he was more
popular among the masses of the federation's affiliates and shop stewards
than the collective leadership of the federation. 

 

Vavi was dismissed by COSATU for multiple counts of misconduct and was
embroiled in corruption allegations. The federation announced his expulsion
in its Central Executive Committee (CEC) statement on April 8. Vavi, a man
who likes people to believe that he has a high moral ground, convinced
himself that he was popular and that this will see delegates at COSATU
special national congress reinstate him. 

 

Well, here on earth all motions are governed by, if not subject to, the
force of gravity. This is configured in such a way that what goes up, comes
down - especially when it loses support from the pillars that ensured its
upward movement. 

 

It was made clear that Vavi will remain dismissed. This time not by the CEC,
but by the decision of COSATU's special national congress.

 

On credentials, an overwhelming majority voted in support of the admission
of COSATU's new affiliate, LIMUSA, and for Zingiswa Losi's continued locus
standi as the federation's second vice president. The final tallies were
about 1700 in favour of the decision, 200 against, with about 250
abstentions. 

 

The results were clear from the onset. They could statistically be worked
out from the compositions and numerical strengths of COSATU affiliates. 

 

On the one hand, the affiliates that fully supported the federation's CEC
and its activities. On the other hand, those affiliates that had boycotted
the federation's CEC meetings and other activities. 

 

The results were and shall forever remain in sharp contrast to a right-wing
liberal interpretation that dominated much of the media regarding the
character of progressive trade unionism and its democratic processes,
especially COSATU. Vavi and the leadership clique that surrounds him were
partly responsible for that right-wing liberal distortion. The biased media
also produced editorials and selected or commissioned opinion pieces in
favour of Vavi and his ilk.

 

Contrary to the individualism of liberalism and its reliance on disunity (in
this case within COSATU and its individual affiliates), in the progressive
trade union movement once a union decides on a mandate and representatives
to carry that mandate forward they are required to uphold it. 

 

In NUMSA, for instance, those delegates, officials and elected leaders who
depart from the union's mandate are characterised as sell-outs, and face a
variety of subtle or blatant consequences or victimisation. 

 

The embedded media, and of course in favour of their man, Vavi, and as he
says it himself, continue to bombard us with their right-wing liberal and
divisive propaganda, that the majority of delegates at COSATU special
national congress did not support their own mandates and unions.

 

The results of that congress, which some sections of the media marginalised
in reporting, are there for all to see for themselves. 

 

During the second round of voting, on whether Vavi should be an item for
consideration for reinstatement by the special national congress, about 1420
delegates voted no, only 23 voted yes, 160 abstained, and others had decided
to leave in order to attend to other priorities. Their apology was presented
after the vote, and was accepted by the congress. 

 

The mood among delegates suggested that Vavi's popularity, which was more
the product of COSATU's collective struggles than his private personal
engagements, had passed its climax. 

 

Plenary discussions, especially on the abuse of women by their male bosses
at work, did not work in favour of Vavi either.

 

A factional pamphlet was delivered and circulated to the congress in an
entryist manner to deepen disunity and influence delegates in support of
Vavi. The pamphlet bore the logos of eight COSATU affiliates and one
expelled affiliate, NUMSA. 

 

COSATU affiliates whose logos were used took to the microphone to distance
themselves from the pamphlet. They condemned the unauthorised use of their
logos. The Communication Workers Union (CWU) was the first. The union
further said it will consider legal action. 

 

Shortly after the congress, a letter circulated from the union went viral in
social media. It stated that CWU was withdrawing from the so-called
nine-plus unions, including NUMSA, whose leaders had organised counteracting
parallelism against COSATU's CEC and the federation's activities. The letter
stated that CWU was rallying behind the decisions of the special national
congress. 

 

The congress' robust discussions saw it on its last day unanimously adopting
a declaration. 

 

What was Vavi's reaction?

 

The man who said the owners of the federation will speak at its special
national congress, reacted by referring to the delegates as "sycophants"
(Sunday Times, July 19, pg 10) 

 

A lot is yet to be written about the role played by the media and media
practitioners in fuelling divisions within COSATU and covering the
federation in a factionally motivated or biased manner. 

 

.    Mluleki Dlelanga is Young Communist League of SA national secretary

 

 

From:
<http://tnaepaper.co.za/DRIVE/main%20edition/28072015/epaperpdf/19.pdf>
http://tnaepaper.co.za/DRIVE/main%20edition/28072015/epaperpdf/19.pdf

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to