Moon of Alabama.png

 

 

Whitewashing his foreign policy,

Obama messes himself

 

 

Moon of Alabama, 10 March 2016

 

The Atlantic publishes Obama's great whitewashing of his own foreign policy.
It is the result of a series of interviews with Jeffrey Goldberg written up
into one gigantic piece under the headline "The Obama Doctrine". Throughout
the piece Goldberg and Obama touch various foreign policy issues, mainly in
the Middle East.

 

The ostensible purpose is to refute hawkish critics of Obama who say that he
has not been militaristic enough or was 'leading from behind.' Judging from
comments to the piece in various media the readers seem to fall for that.
But the real purpose of the piece is to hide the militaristic, dangerous to
catastrophic decision Obama has made on many foreign policy issues.

 

The real Obama has used the military to wage open or hidden wars in more
countries than any president since the second world war. Obama has ordered
thousands of unknown people be killed by drone strikes in ten or so
countries. He has used clandestine means for illegitimate regime change from
Honduras over Ukraine to Iraq where, as he admitted in an earlier interview,
let the evil of ISIS grow for the sole purpose of ousting Prime Minister
Maliki. Instead of making room for the inevitable growth of China, Obama is
preparing to wage a pre-emptive war against it.

 

The whitewash includes a lot of juicy, diverting quotes that many people
will like. It bitches about foreign paid think tanks in Washington and the
Saudis. It lambastes Cameron and Sarkozy. It badmouths his own hawkish
advisers.

 

When it discusses why Obama let his 'red line' on chemical weapons in Syria
slip and did not bomb the country it tries to paint Obama's decisions on
Syria as sensible and reasoned. But what is sensible or reasoned in ordering
the CIA to ship thousands of Jihadis, recycled from his war on Libya and
earlier conflicts, to Syria? What is peaceful in arming and paying sectarian
"rebels" with billions of dollars to overthrow the legitimate Syrian
government? The piece does not mention those facts and the interviewer never
touches those questions.

 

Obama criticizes the Saudis and Iran for waging proxy wars in Syria and
Yemen. But Iran came in only after Obama and the Saudis waged war on those
countries. Without him Yemen would not be bombed and Syria would be
peaceful. It is he who enables the Saudi misdeeds.

 

On Libya the president blames France and Britain for dropping the ball after
Gaddafi was killed. But it was the U.S. that enabled and directed the war,
flew most attacks, dropped 7,700 bombs and had its people on the ground
training and organizing the Jihadis for attacks on government positions.
Here the fake 'leading from behind' is used to blame the allies when the
inevitable consequences of the war, the destruction of the functioning state
Libya, appear.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to