READ TO THE END!

. SADTU notes that the MTT has deviated from its mandate and focussed on
matters unrelated to its mandate. SADTU believes that this amply
demonstrates that the MTT commenced this investigation with a pre-conceived
mind and this explains the apparent bias towards SADTU and its members.
. SADTU calls upon the MTT to declare in public that its investigation was
not influenced by any political or other pressure to target SADTU as part of
the broader mass democratic movement and to discredit the overall
socio-economic and political change process driven by the mass democratic
movement.
. SADTU calls upon the MTT to provide official reasons in public for its
failure to have the plethora of allegations made against SADTU and the
Tripartite Alliance tested and the parties afforded an opportunity to refute
such allegation prior to making the conclusions the MTT has made in its
report.

  _____  


 

 



 

SADTU3

 

SADTU Update, February 2016

 

 

Speaker's Notes and Booklet for the

 

2016 Education Workers' Forums

 

 


Full Contents (present sections in bold):

 


Introduction


Pseudo Movements


Defending Collective Bargaining


The Privatisation of Education


Migration of TVET Lecturers in terms of the Public Service Act


Government Employees' Medical Scheme (GEMS)


Government Employee Housing Scheme (GEHS)


2016 Retirement and Tax Reforms


Record of NEC Decisions on MTT recommendations


Conclusion

 

 


Record of NEC Decisions on MTT recommendations


 

 

RECORD OF DECISIONS OF OUR NATIONAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (NEC) (28 January
2016) ON THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE MINISTERIAL TASK TEAM
(MTT), INTO ALLEGATIONS OF IRREGULAR APPOINTMENT OF EDUCATORS AT SCHOOL.

 

 

A.     FINDINGS RELATING TO MATTERS OF ADMINISTRATION.

 

A1.  On the findings of the MTT on whether SADTU as a union played any role
in irregular appointment of educators at schools.

 

NEC Resolution:

.        The MTT should be called upon to provide direct cogent evidence of
its findings or withdraw unconditionally any suggestion that SADTU was
involved and/or played any role in any irregular appointment.

.        The MTT should be called upon to indicate and provide cogent
evidence of the relationship between the membership of the individual
members in respect of whom it investigated, such membership and the role
played by SADTU in any alleged role by such members in any irregular
appointment and to provide evidence of such irregular appointments and the
role played by SADTU.

 

A2.  On the findings of the MTT on whether officials and members of SADTU
played any role in the irregular appointment of educators at schools.

 

NEC Resolution:

.        SADTU does not condone the appointment of any person who does not
hold appropriate qualifications for any post in the public service. SADTU
calls on the MTT to verify the qualifications of those members whose
qualifications it finds questionable with the South African Qualifications
Authority. SADTU is undertaking its own independent process to verify those
qualifications and should it be found that any of its members were appointed
without the requisite qualifications SADTU will take decisive action against
such members including but not limited to their expulsion.

.        Members and officials of SADTU who are implicated and/or found to
have played any role in irregular appointments must where sufficient
evidence exist be subjected to disciplinary and other action prescribed in
law. SADTU resolves to conduct its own independent investigation in the
conduct of such members and will take appropriate action should any evidence
be found of wrongdoing on the part of such members or officials in line with
the Constitution of SADTU.

.        SADTU resolves that in those instances where persons who lodged
complaints and failed to provide evidence to support their allegations,
disciplinary and other actions be taken against such person. SADTU therefore
calls upon the government to take appropriate action against such persons.

.        To the extend person who lodged complaints with the MTT well aware
that those matters were already adjudicated upon, such persons abused the
process of the MTT and to face consequences for such abuse.  

.        SADTU further resolves to call upon all members to give their full
cooperation to any agency in the implementation of any actions against those
found to be involved.

 

B.    FINDINGS RELATING TO MATTERS OF A POLITICAL NATURE

 

B1. On the findings of the MTT on the issue of the alleged cadre deployment
by SADTU.

 

NEC Resolution:

.        SADTU rejects the allegations of the MTT with regards the alleged
cadre deployment. SADTU calls upon the MTT to provide evidence to support
the allegations of a cadre deployment programme and to provide specific
evidence of any person or persons who was appointed as a result of any such
cadre deployment. Should the MTT fail to provide any such evidence, the MTT
is called upon to unconditionally withdraw any such allegations and tender
an apology to both SADTU and its members.

 

.        Whilst SADTU acknowledges possible isolated instances where
unqualified persons were appointed, SADTU rejects any suggestion that the
overwhelming members of the teaching profession are unqualified or appointed
to positions where they are not suitably qualified for. SADTU calls upon the
MTT to provide evidence of any appointments of an audit of the
qualifications of teachers in general and its members in particular who are
not qualified in the positions in which they are appointed. Should the MTT
fail to provide such evidence, the MTT is called upon to unconditionally
withdraw any such allegations.

 

.        SADTU rejects the allegations of corruption levelled against it by
the MTT and calls upon the MTT to either lay charges of corruption against
SADTU or provide evidence of any such corruption or withdraw the allegations
and tender an unconditional apology.

 

B3.  On the findings of the MTT with regards the investigation report by
SACE and the alleged domination and manipulation of SACE by SADTU.

 

NEC Resolution:

.        SADTU reaffirms its position that SACE is a professional body for
educators by educators structured as agreed between the parties to SACE.
SADTU further reaffirms its position that the representation on the SACE
Board accords with proportion of the constituents of SACE and therefore
rejects any suggestion of the alleged domination and manipulation.

.        SADTU places on record that it has at no stage seen any report
prepared by SACE tabled at any SACE Board meeting or discussed at any board
meeting or discussed by SADTU or its officials. SADTU therefore rejects any
suggestion that it embargoed any SACE report and demand that the MTT provide
proof of the existence of such a report as well as the evidence that SADTU
embargoed any such report.

.        SADTU further resolves that should the MTT fail to produce such
proof and evidence, the MTT is required to make an unconditional apology to
SADTU for making such unfounded allegations.

 

B4.  On the findings of the MTT on the issue of the relationship between the
ANC, SACP and COSATU and the alleged use by SADTU of these structures to
advance corrupt appointments.

 

NEC Resolution:

.        SADTU notes that the MTT veered off its terms of reference and
entered a political space. SADTU takes strong exception to the MTT probing
its political relationship which SADTU is entitled to have and distorting
facts to create an impression of a corrupt political establishment.

.        SADTU also rejects any proposition that its leaders are preoccupied
with securing positions in parliament and Cabinet.

.        SADTU reaffirms its confidence and trust in its former leaders who
through the processes of the Tripartite Alliance are deployed in parliament
and Cabinet.

.        SADTU consequently calls on the MTT to clarify its interest in the
political relationship between SADTU and the tripartite alliance and to
provide evidence of its allegations or unconditionally withdraw any such
allegations and apologise to SADTU and those former members and leaders who
now occupy positions in parliament and Cabinet.

 

C.      FINDINGS OF THE MTT WITH REGARDS SCHOOL GOVERNING BODIES.

 

NEC Resolution:

.        SADTU reiterates its position that School Governing Bodies are
organs of mass participation intended to provide a structured platform for
the effective participation of parents and communities in the education of
their children. SADTU further reaffirms its position that as education is a
societal issue, any attempt to limit community and parental participation in
the affairs of the schools will undermine this principle.

.        SADTU rejects any suggestion and views that as an insult that
illiteracy and poverty provide a basis for any conclusion that parents may
be for that reason manipulated. On the contrary SADTU holds a view that the
participation of parents in rural areas in particular despite the various
limitations accounts for a significant contribution in the education
outcomes.

.        SADTU further affirms the rights of parents and communities to
elect into leadership positions through a democratic process members of
School Governing Bodies regardless of the level of education and does not
believe in any proposition that lack of formal education reduces parental
responsibility.

.        SADTU notes the attempt by the MTT to reintroduce the concept of
state schools and to reverse the transformational approach from state
schools to public schools and reject with the contempt it deserves any such
approach. SADTU reiterates its position that schools must remain public
schools and the true owners must remain the communities the school serve.

.        SADTU resolves that any proposition to reduce the powers of School
Governing Bodies be rejected and that more resources be made available for
capacity building programmes for School Governing Bodies.

 

D.    FINDINGS REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOLS LED BY SADTU MEMBERS.

 

D1.  Findings of the MTT on the alleged role of SADTU in preventing the

provision of proper education and the alleged advancement of self-interest.

 

NEC Resolution:

.        SADTU notes that the conclusions of the MTT are based on the biased
views of the members of the MTT against SADTU and its members and are not
based on objective facts. The MTT has not investigated the performance of
many schools under the leadership of SADTU members who have performed above
the national target.

.        SADTU notes that a number of schools under the leadership of
members of SADTU in various provinces performed above the national target of
70% in the 2015 NSC examinations.

.        SADTU acknowledges the many of its members who received awards for
high performance in the various categories following the performance of
their schools. SADTU believes these are examples of pockets of excellence
which the MTT has elected to ignore.

.        SADTU rejects the suggestions and innuendo of the MTT which are
neither factual nor based on objective facts and calls upon the MTT to
withdraw any such allegations.

 

E.      FINDINGS RELATING TO MATTERS INVOLVING RIGHTS OF MEMBERS.

 

E1.  On the findings of the MTT regarding the issue of membership and
recruitment.

 

NEC Resolution:

.        SADTU wishes to reiterate that the rights of workers to belong to a
union of their choice is a right guaranteed in terms of the Bill of Rights.
SADTU rejects any attempt to limit any such right by way of an executive
decree and not in line with the procedure set out in the Bill of Rights of
requiring rights to only be limited by a law of general application.

.        SADTU further rejects any attempt through the process of the MTT or
any other process to water down the structures, systems and procedures set
out in the Labour Relations Act to give effect to the right of workers
guaranteed in the Bill of Rights.

.        SADTU notes with contempt the attempt by the MTT to introduce
apartheid era policies into our democratic system.

 

E2.  Findings of MTT regarding the relationship between the Department and
SADTU.

 

NEC Resolution:

.        SADTU reaffirms its position that its primary responsibility as a
trade union is towards its members. SADTU further reaffirms its position
that it has the right to enforce its collective bargaining rights and to
insist on compliance by the Department with collective bargaining processes
and systems.

.        SADTU reaffirms that the Department as an employer is required to
contribute to labour peace by not taking unilateral decisions which have
adverse implications for members.

 

F.      APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY MTT.

 

F1.  On the failure to base findings on evidence and objective facts.

 

NEC Resolution:

.        SADTU believes that the conclusions and findings of the MTT in many
respects are not based on objective facts or supported by evidence.

.        SADTU further questions the methodology and approach adopted by the
MTT which did not include obtaining any evidence either on a sample bases as
an accepted best practice to make certain conclusions. For instance SADTU
rejects a conclusion of wholesale irregularities in appointments in the
absence of an audit at the least on sample basis to determine whether
specific irregularities occurred in the appointment process. SADTU also
rejects conclusions based on perceptions where no perception surveys were
conducted.

.        SADTU further notes that the MTT mainly relied on one newspaper
article despite creating an impression that there was extensive media
coverage. Whilst SADTU recognises the responsibility of media to report on
matters of public interest, SADTU equally rejects the propagation and
reliance on untested media reports.

.        SADTU notes that various persons and organisations are alleged to
have made various adverse reports and expressed negative views about SADTU.
SADTU notes that the MTT has not at any stage provided SADTU with an
opportunity to respond to such reports and views on the strength whereof the
MTT based its conclusions and findings.

.        SADTU notes that the MTT has deviated from its mandate and focussed
on matters unrelated to its mandate. SADTU believes that this amply
demonstrates that the MTT commenced this investigation with a pre-conceived
mind and this explains the apparent bias towards SADTU and its members.

.        SADTU calls upon the MTT to declare in public that its
investigation was not influenced by any political or other pressure to
target SADTU as part of the broader mass democratic movement and to
discredit the overall socio-economic and political change process driven by
the mass democratic movement.

.        SADTU calls upon the MTT to provide official reasons in public for
its failure to have the plethora of allegations made against SADTU and the
Tripartite Alliance tested and the parties afforded an opportunity to refute
such allegation prior to making the conclusions the MTT has made in its
report.

 

 

 


Conclusion


 

SADTU doesn't condone corruption, fraud and non-meritorious appointments.
Selling of posts is counter-revolutionary and any member found guilty of
this act must be harshly dealt with. Members are called upon to defend this
fighting Union, SADTU. Collective Bargaining and Consultations at NEDLAC,
PSCBC and ELRC must be defended. We are COSATU and we shall not allow
unilateral policy declaration on any matter.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to