> Personally, what I'd really like is basic macro support, a Lisp mode,
> and a shell mode. With those three things, most of my Emacs
> functionality would be replicated.

There is (more or less) a shell mode already. (M-x shell)

> Random polish is also quite as valuable as better internal docs; we
> shouldn't be releasing half-broken stuff eg. M-x insertB was broken
> but it seems no one noticed that until I began experimenting with the
> M-x functions (trying to see why 'box replaceString' was failing).

The interpreter is a damn ugly hack in general, I hope I can put
students to work on it in the spring. :)

Cheers,
JP.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Yi development mailing list
yi-devel@googlegroups.com
http://groups.google.com/group/yi-devel
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to