> Personally, what I'd really like is basic macro support, a Lisp mode, > and a shell mode. With those three things, most of my Emacs > functionality would be replicated.
There is (more or less) a shell mode already. (M-x shell) > Random polish is also quite as valuable as better internal docs; we > shouldn't be releasing half-broken stuff eg. M-x insertB was broken > but it seems no one noticed that until I began experimenting with the > M-x functions (trying to see why 'box replaceString' was failing). The interpreter is a damn ugly hack in general, I hope I can put students to work on it in the spring. :) Cheers, JP. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Yi development mailing list yi-devel@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/yi-devel -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---