>From: [email protected] [mailto:yocto- >[email protected]] On Behalf Of Xu, Jiajun >Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:33 AM > >> Hi Jiajun, >> >> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 08:49 +0000, Xu, Jiajun wrote: >>> The overall open bug trend increased a lot in last week. The new >>> submitted vs. fixed bug number is 64 vs. 52. Some fixed bugs are >>> enhancement bug, which are not calculated into WDD data. WDD number >>> and Open Bug number are 938 and 188. Bug status of WW11 could be >>> found on https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Bug_Trend. >> >> I agree that there were 64 vs 52 bugs last week which is a change of 12 bugs. >> The top two charts show increases of 50 and 30 bugs though so the >> numbers don't seem to add up for me :/. I appreciate the bugzilla >> update upset the accounting but it looks like some of the historical >> data is inaccurate somewhere :( > >Good catch. :) >For the first picture, it is the trend of open bugs by >importance(High/Medium/Low/Undecided) with all bugs included. For the >second picture, it is the trend of open bugs by >severity(minor/normal/major/critical) without enhancement bugs. The first >picture is to give us a whole picture of all open bugs. The second one is to >give >us a true picture of the real bugs - without bugs created for feature enabling.
We need to get this data really clean because we make a lot of decisions based on it. Please work with RP to address this >BTW, when I check the open bug data, I find that a new variable is introduced >with new bugzilla for field "severity" - janitors. We do not include the bugs >marked as janitors in "Yocto Weekly Open bug Trend(Severity)". My thinking >is that janitors is similar with enhancement. We could treat it as >enhancement(with weight value "0"), or if we think it should be included into >WDD, we could set a weight value for it. How do you think of it? >Fortunately, we only have 4 bugs marked as janitors, and they are all new >reported last week. We could simply update the bug trend once we make the >decision. I suggest we make the janitor severity the same as low in the WDD calculation. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Richard > >Best Regards, >Jiajun > > >_______________________________________________ >yocto mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
