On 03/19/2012 09:18 AM, Stewart, David C wrote: >> From: [email protected] [mailto:yocto- >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Xu, Jiajun >> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:33 AM
>> BTW, when I check the open bug data, I find that a new variable is introduced >> with new bugzilla for field "severity" - janitors. We do not include the bugs >> marked as janitors in "Yocto Weekly Open bug Trend(Severity)". My thinking >> is that janitors is similar with enhancement. We could treat it as >> enhancement(with weight value "0"), or if we think it should be included into >> WDD, we could set a weight value for it. How do you think of it? >> Fortunately, we only have 4 bugs marked as janitors, and they are all new >> reported last week. We could simply update the bug trend once we make the >> decision. > > I suggest we make the janitor severity the same as low in the WDD calculation. > I don't know what "low" would map to. The key says: "The weight we use for each severity: Critical:10, Major:7, Normal:5, Minor:3, Enhancement:0 " In my view, Janitors should be marked the same as Enhancement, 0. If a bug is important enough to track and impact release, it shouldn't be a janitors bug, which by definition are intended to sit in a pool for new-comers and irregular contributors to pick up. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
