I can replace the information on http://www.yoctoproject.org/community/mailing-lists with a generic bit about mailing lists and then provide a link to the https://lists.yoctoproject.org/ page. Regarding the text on the https://lists.yoctoproject.org link. Who maintains that page?
Scott -----Original Message----- From: Denys Dmytriyenko [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 12:15 PM To: Darren Hart Cc: Yocto Project; Rifenbark, Scott M; Paul Gortmaker; Richard Purdie; Wold, Saul; Paul Eggleton; Osier-mixon, Jeffrey; Zanussi, Tom; Hudson, Sean; Koen Kooi; Jason Kridner; Flanagan, Elizabeth; Michael Halstead Subject: Re: Documenting the mailing lists. On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:43:38AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > Scott, > > We've come across some more confusion about mailing lists recently. I've > sent a patch against poky to try and clear it up a bit in the source, > but we should also see about cleaning up the web descriptions of the lists. > > We have two pages that describe the lists: > > http://www.yoctoproject.org/community/mailing-lists > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/ > > My first recommendation would be to eliminate > http://www.yoctoproject.org/community/mailing-lists and replace links to > it with links to https://lists.yoctoproject.org. This eliminates the > need to keep the CMS version in sync with the mailman page. The mailman > page should be considered the master anyway as the Description field is > taken directly from the list administrative settings. I completely agree with this proposal to unify and clean up the mailing list references and descriptions. I didn't even know there was a separate page at http://www.yoctoproject.org/community/mailing-lists - probably because I was happy with https://lists.yoctoproject.org/ all the time :) > We should then work to create meaningful Descriptions of all the lists. > These should still fit on a single line, but I think we can improve on > what we have. For example: > > meta-ti Mailing list for the meta-ti layer > > is not particularly enlightening. Perhaps something like: > > meta-ti Usage and development of the meta-ti layer Not sure if this improves much - in either case it's just a generic description of the mailing list that is specific to the corresponding layer, meta-ti. But I'm fine with the change, as long as we are unifying all the other list descriptions. > If we do this all at once, we can also ensure a consistent language, > tone, etc. Exactly! Thanks for initiating this. > I'll propose something for each list here and ask that > interested parties comment and correct in reply. Once agreed upon, the > admins of the respective lists can make the changes (all CC'd) > > Current: > ======== > linux-yocto Development list for the linux-yocto*.git Linux kernel > repositories > meta-ti Mailing list for the meta-ti layer > poky Poky build system developer discussion & patch > submission for meta-yocto > shoeleather Neutral Board Lab Mailing List > yocto Discussion of all things Yocto > yocto-ab Yocto Project Advisory Board > yocto-advocacy Yocto Project Advocacy & Outreach AB Subgroup > yocto-announce Announcements from the Yocto Project > yocto-bsp BSP Interest Group > Yocto-builds Build failures and discusion about the build system > yocto-infrastructure Infrastructure > > > Proposed: > ========= > linux-yocto Development list for the linux-yocto*.git Linux kernel > repositories > meta-ti Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer > poky Usage and development list for the Poky build system > (see README for patch submission) > shoeleather Neutral Board Lab Mailing List > > I'm not sure what "neutral" is meant to convey. How about: > > Discussion list for the Shoeleather embedded board lab > > yocto General discussion list for the Yocto Project and > development for projects without dedicated lists > > I think the yocto list is a bit problematic in that it mixes project > conceptual discussion, user help desk, and development all on the same > list. However, I'm trying to clarify what these actually are here - not > change anything. > > yocto-ab Yocto Project Advisory Board ??? > > This should imply the intended audience. Is it just meant for members? > Is it meant as a way for non-AB members to observe what is going on? > > yocto-advocacy Yocto Project advocacy & outreach AB subgroup > > Same as above. > > yocto-announce Announcements from the Yocto Project (low traffic) > yocto-bsp BSP Interest Group ??? > > There is no detailed description for this list, so I'm not sure what > this is really about. > > Yocto-builds Build failures and discussion about the autobuilder > > (includes typo fix, "build system" removed to avoid confusion with the > "poky build system") > > yocto-infrastructure Infrastructure ??? > > Jefro or Michael, can you come up with something appropriate here? > > > For lists where certain guidelines should be used in communications and > patch submission, we should document that in the detailed description of > the list, such as [project] tags for example. -- Denys _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list [email protected] https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
