|
Yoper Devs, On Thursday 28 September 2006 5:23, you wrote: > Well, actually i would prefer something less extreme. Like adding > information trough the forum description or a sticky thread. > The way i see it the forum section should be used for discussion and not > concrete requests and bugreports. > I think the "Documentation" forum can be locked and archived. Team members can work on writing all its documentation into the wiki. If we wanted to leave some breadcrumbs in the forums to Documentation we can have the forum "Documentation" link redirect to the wiki similar to the way that the German forums redirect to yoper.de > I know we have been talking about changing the sections in the forum > before, but it seems like its really about time now. > Even team members use it different from what we kind of decided. > I'm in support of changing the sections around. I think hashing out the differences between 2.x and 3.x though can wait until 3.0's full release though. > In the support section we have a lot of stuff that would be better hadled > trough bugtracker or wiki. Most of the content in > "Introduction for new users" and "Documentation" would be better suited > for the Wiki. While a lot of the thresds in "Bugs", > "Hardware Issues", "Conundrums (Unresolved Issues)" and "Software Issues > and Updates" belongs in the bugtracker. Conundrums - It can be archived completely. If someone feels like sifting through it and adding outstanding issues to Bugtracker they can go right ahead. I don't know how many relevant issues still exist within Conundrums though. Bugs - Redirect to the Bugtracker. Software Issues and Updates - Rename to "Software Issues" and leave it in the forums. Sift through the stickies and unsticky ones that aren't... ehh... sticky-worthy anymore :) Hardware Issues - Sift through it and unsticky things that don't merit a sticky anymore. > > The yoper team section has to many sections, and is almost not used any > more. > > By merging some of these sections and informing about where stuff should > be posted would probebly help. > > > I undestand your POV Tobias and i agree that we cant just remove the forum > sections, but to get any change we have to meke it > easy for everyone to see where they are suppose to post stuff. > > Lets talk about this on the meeting:) > > That's my $0.02 :) --Reid Miller (oreo_masta) > > On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 03:27:34 +0200, Tobias Gerschner > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > Petter please correct me here, if I got you wrong: > > > > pettern did ask me in the forum whether I agree to disable / certain > > parts of the forums to get users into using the bugtracker. > > > > I actually do not care. I see petter's point, but from my POV people > > won't use the bugtracker when we remove appropriate forum sections. > > They would stopped talking to us. Which is bad. > > > > Maybe I see it to simple but imho that's how people are. > > > > Just my 2 cents. After all I am not a forum guy and I'd prefer having > > more people actively using the bugtracker . No idea how to enforce > > that though. Maybe another good point for the yet unscheduled meeting. > > > > > > regards |
_______________________________________________ yoper-dev mailing list [email protected] https://morpheus.pingos.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/yoper-dev
