I've started looking through this (downloaded it to a safe location for an initial run) and it's looking very good so far.
The integration with the CLI is absolutely fine - and I apologise for such a convoluted setup! It occurs to me that we are now setting a 'gold standard' so we should ensure that this is as true as possible to the original behaviour, and if not whether the changes are minor enough to be acceptable. I'm starting to look through some of my old projects (I never throw anything away) and my first test showed up something a bit odd. I have both the wav recording from 2008 (zyn 2.2.1) and the project files for it, so made a fresh recording using as close as possible to an identical setup. The only thing I don't know is the buffer size I used then - I'm assuming it was either 128 or 256 frames. I then loaded both the new and original recordings into adjacent tracks in Audacity, lined them up and set them to the same amplitude. I ran through them alternately solo-ing each. The first thing I noticed was reversed channel - which reminded me that zyn used to get it wrong, and Cal corrected that :) One other thing I saw in the display and *think* I heard was that although tonally they seem identical, dynamic amplitude levels are slightly different. I don't know quite what to make of that, but will try and dig out more tracks through Yoshimi's past and see if I can hear anything. If you have similar older work perhaps you can find time to do the same comparison. I don't think a subtraction comparison is viable under these circumstances. >From Wednesday till next Monday I'm off grid at the New Forest Folk Festival :) It's been a long wait! -- Will J Godfrey https://willgodfrey.bandcamp.com/ http://yoshimi.github.io Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Yoshimi-devel mailing list Yoshimi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yoshimi-devel
