On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 18:22:29 +0100 ichthyo <p...@ichthyostega.de> wrote:
>I'd say this means to strike a difficult balance. >Supporting a multitude of working styles implies that there are >a lot of pathways that seem to be superfluous or even plain confusing, >when you look at it from one angle... > >The point I'd like to make is: seemingly we can approach this feature "Omni" >in different ways. Which one would fit best into the existing framework >and which one is least prone to trap and surprise the unwary? Do we only want all or 1? Or do we want to be able to select incoming channels for a part? -- Will J Godfrey. _______________________________________________ Yoshimi-devel mailing list Yoshimi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/yoshimi-devel
