On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 12:55 -0500, James Bowes wrote: > Jeremy Katz wrote: > >> Lastly, how about marking the existing do* methods as deprecated? :) > > Well, they have to exist in some form or another -- direct calls of them > > probably won't be needed in The Future (tm), but the _getter will still > > need to call them. > > Oh, I should have finished the thought: mark them as deprecated, and > eventually replace them with _ versions.
That sounds like it's just crazy enough to work! But yeah, with that, seems reasonable. Arguably we could go ahead and do the move when marking them as deprecated. Jeremy _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
