On Wed, 2007-02-21 at 12:44 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > > It might be best to have the logic to see if the field is already > > populated live outside of the do* methods, so that their behaviour is > > not changed. > > We almost certainly want to do this. > > > Can the new do* methods all be _do*? > > Or maybe _get? :)
or maybe we can change their name every few hours b/c it won't matter much! :) > > > Lastly, how about marking the existing do* methods as deprecated? :) > > Well, they have to exist in some form or another -- direct calls of them > probably won't be needed in The Future (tm), but the _getter will still > need to call them. that's the fget'er, duh. :) > > > I love this though. It will make a lot of the code look so much nicer. > > Agreed You should agree. You were the one who said yesterday "maybe we should make these properties so we don't have to call self.doSackSetup() before using it" :) -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dulug.duke.edu/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
