On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 13:06 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Avoids another lowlevel rpm routine usage where rpmsack provides > a nicer interface for the thing, and another step towards consolidating > rpm quirk handling to one spot.
This makes me twitch a bit, it just seems wrong to have config depend on rpmsack ... I can't see any problems atm. though, so let me think about it a bit more. Anyone else have an opinion? _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
