On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 10:08 -0500, James Antill wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 13:06 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Avoids another lowlevel rpm routine usage where rpmsack provides > > a nicer interface for the thing, and another step towards consolidating > > rpm quirk handling to one spot. > > This makes me twitch a bit, it just seems wrong to have config depend > on rpmsack ... I can't see any problems atm. though, so let me think > about it a bit more. > Anyone else have an opinion? >
feels like a place where we'll trip up later by a stray or circular import but there's nothing implicitly worrisome about it. I use the RpmDBPackageSack object directly for talking to the rpmdb w/o instantiating a yumbase object pretty commonly in little random scripts. -sv _______________________________________________ Yum-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.baseurl.org/mailman/listinfo/yum-devel
