Jon Smirl wrote:
> I just did a 15GB copy test and averaged 13Mb/sec, Windows can copy
> the same files at 19Mb/sec. It appears that CIFS has higher throughput
> than SMBFS (10Mb).

I think using such a high level protocol for speed tests is a mistake 
and has certainly wasted some of your time so far. You should try 
low-level TCP transfers using netcat or something. I have personally had 
trouble making cifs/samba perform at something comparable to the 
available network bandwidth.

You should also now retest the vendor driver and see if you can 
reproduce the vendor-driver-is-2x-faster thing.

You also need to explicitly test downstream and upstream separately, and 
classify the problems by direction.

> I have 1000's of these in my log. 10-15 per second
> handle_retry_failed_int() retry failed interrupt

These are generated for frame transmission failures (read: no ACK). You 
get several of them for each frame as they are retried multiple times 
before it gives up.

> I also have a few of these, once every minute
> [21901.205436] zd1211rw 5-1.4:1.0: zd_usb_ioread16v() read timed out
> [21901.205442] zd1211rw 5-1.4:1.0: zd_chip_control_leds error -110

You could try disabling the LED code and seeing if that has an effect on 

> Hit an assert:
> Jan  4 16:53:21 jonsmirl kernel: [19010.649771]
> drivers/net/wireless/zd1211rw/zd_chip.c:1461 ASSERT r >= 0 VIOLATED!
> Jan  4 16:53:21 jonsmirl kernel: [19010.649790]
> [pg0+946006505/1069057024] zd_rx_qual_percent+0x49/0x170 [zd1211rw]

> Jan  4 16:53:21 jonsmirl kernel: [19010.649987] zd1211rw 5-1.4:1.0:
> zd_mac_rx() Error in packet.

CRC failed, ignore it, frame was discarded.


Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
Zd1211-devs mailing list -

Reply via email to