Hi, I generally like this - the only thing that I am not sure about is the alpha label.
I get that it works great with alphabetic ordering - but for me alpha tends to signify some kind of test release. Could we perhaps make it -dev? :). If we then use -rc instead of -beta we have alphabetical ordering again - and to me this tends to represent what we are doing better in any caseā¦ Johanna On 24 Jul 2019, at 16:29, Jon Siwek wrote: > I'm suggesting a small change to our usual development and versioning > process of the "master" branch: replace post-release versioning with > pre-release versioning. E.g. once we enter the 3.0.0 beta period, > "master" will start using versions like 3.1.0-alpha.X where the old > process would have used 3.0.0-X (where X is number of commits since > the git tag). > > Full description: https://github.com/zeek/zeek/issues/488 > > Please raise any potential issues soon if you find any. > > - Jon > _______________________________________________ > zeek-dev mailing list > zeek-dev@zeek.org > http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/zeek-dev _______________________________________________ zeek-dev mailing list zeek-dev@zeek.org http://mailman.icsi.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/zeek-dev