--- In [email protected], Kristy McClain <healthyplay1@...> wrote:
>
> Gentlemen,
>  
> People are not so uni-dimensional, or easily classified. I think this is a 
> fine game-- like Clue.  But trying to "sort" this  way obscures clarity. 
> Why  bother discussing illusion and duality, and then assert these ideas and 
> definitions, unless indeed it is a means to better understand self, others 
> and the world around you. Which makes sense, but still dualistic, imo. I can 
> assure you that analytical people  can also  be keenly intuitive, as  an 
> example. So the question is, can one actually exist in non-duality with no 
> illusions?  
>  
> Meanwhile, I'm  making the  nacho dip, and pulled pork sandwiches. Be 
> well.. ~ k 
> 
>  Hi Kristy. Yeah, you're right about that. I hope you enjoyed the game.
Steve



------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to