So smack me! And, after you've smacked me, it shall be as if you'd never 
smacked me, at all?
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill!" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 2:38 AM
Subject: [Zen] Re: Mindfulness


> Dana,
>
> When I am in the dharma hall and listen to spoken dharma, or when I am in 
> my study and reading written dharma, or when I am walking along a path and 
> experiencing living dharma I am listening to or reading or experiencing 
> dharma at that moment in time.
>
> When I leave the dharma hall and go down to the pool hall to shoot some 
> nine-ball, I shoot nine-ball.  I don't think back about the dharma talk.
>
> Like it says in the movie by the same name: 'That was then - This is now.' 
> Actually is all now.  The memory of the dharma talk is a memory now, it's 
> not a dharma talk now.
>
> ...Bill!
>
> ...Bill!
>
> --- In [email protected], "Dana S. Leslie" <dsleslie3@...> wrote:
>>
>> The Wikipedia article on Mindfulness:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindfulness_(Buddhism)
>> makes a point that, at first blush, seems to run counter to Zen's 
>> insistence
>> upon awareness of 'just here, just now.' In discussing the etymology and
>> history of use of the Sanskrit, Pali, and Chinese terms usually 
>> translated
>> as 'mindfulness,' it stresses that they include significant reference to
>> memory, recall, recollection, and other mental faculties related to
>> awareness of the past.
>>
>> Any thoughts on how to reconcile this apparent tension?
>>
>> I have been thinking along these lines: When I hear dharma taught, I 
>> grasp
>> it, according to the level of my understanding. But, when I leave the 
>> dharma
>> hall, I 'should' endeavor not to leave my understanding behind. I 
>> 'should'
>> endeavor to bring it forward with me, into each moment, so that it 
>> informs
>> my 'in this moment' awareness of right thought, right conduct, right
>> speech., Doing so is right mindfulness of the dharma.
>>
>> Bill, you may find this issue pointless, as you do not consider zen
>> Buddhist, or the EFP a part of zen (If I understand you correctly). But, 
>> for
>> those of us who are not quite so iconoclastic <grin>, do any of you have 
>> any
>> thoughts/comments on my proposed reconciliation?
>>
>> Dana
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
> reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 5861 (20110210) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
> 



------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to