--- In [email protected], Anthony Wu <wuasg@...> wrote:
>
> Steve.
> Â
> The difference between you and me is only in definition. When I call
> probability a 'law', there is no one to one relationship. However, there are
> still some 'certainty' elements in it. Otherwise, the quantum mechanics would
> have to be dumped.
> Â
> Anthony
>
But you really don't accept indeterminacy, do you? You think that every event
MUST have a determining cause. Like it or not, the evidence is against that.
Steve
------------------------------------
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
