I read it that way. Just offering a reflection for 'others'. No need to
be doubly redundant, when we are all echoing this! *L*
K
On 6/24/2012 3:38 AM, Bill! wrote:
Kristopher,
Yes, I should have said 'illusion of an ego'...Bill!
--- In [email protected] <mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com>,
Kristopher Grey <kris@...> wrote:
>
> I don't think any do. There's no such thing (as 'sentient beings' or
> 'ego'). That they both appear to exist exist/think otherwise, is an
> apparent aspect of sentience. A trick of the senses. ;)
>
> K
>
> On 6/23/2012 12:23 AM, Bill! wrote:
> >
> >
> > I do think in order to have an ego you must be sentient, but I do not
> > think all sentient beings necessarily have an ego.
> >
>
