Intentionally causing harm does. Not knowing you or Mike I felt that the comments were angry and aggressive. My mistake.
Doesn't matter a wit if I do or don't - but since you keep dragging your cushion around for me to see: FWIW I don't think it's zoning out at all (though some will use it that way). It's also not like you invented it, or it's a big secret. Do you get a discount, or good karma, for mentioning it? ;) No matter what I express, you come back to you own assumptions about what I think - mostly involving some perceived attack on your practice. This makes one of us appears shallow, and the other appear simple minded. You can choose which is which. Anyway, my point was not - despite your well intentioned but unnecessary defenses/efforts to skew them as such - a criticism of your practice. Tomorrow, remind me to stick to one liners and crappy neo-haiku. Still reeks of rotting flesh, but less dead bones for zen dogs to sniff at/snarl over. Bill not Bill! Find what makes your heart sing…and do it! ________________________________ From: Kristopher Grey <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, September 5, 2012 3:57:09 PM Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: " dancing with the daffodils" On 9/5/2012 3:48 PM, William Rintala wrote: > When I realized that what I was asking could be taken negatively I was > horrified and I've never trusted email since. Typing on eggshells makes no less of a mess. KG
