Thanks Mike,

It's nice to know at least someone on this group has an open enough mind to at 
least consider what I post without automatically condemning it whatever it 
might be.

I sometimes suspect if I posted EXACTLY what Joe said say a month ago he'd tell 
us it was all wrong just because it came out of my mouth!
:-)

Edgar



On Mar 29, 2013, at 5:42 AM, [email protected] wrote:

> Edgar,
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone
> 
> From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>; 
> To: <[email protected]>; 
> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: questions/practice 
> Sent: Thu, Mar 28, 2013 12:21:26 PM 
> 
> Mike,
> 
> Are you referring to me?
> :-)
> 
> Best,
> Edgar
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 27, 2013, at 10:00 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>> Edgar,
>> 
>> Yeh! Who needs a pesky teacher to come along and tell you you've got it all 
>> wrong?...
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPhone
>> 
>> From: Edgar Owen <[email protected]>; 
>> To: <[email protected]>; 
>> Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: questions/practice 
>> Sent: Wed, Mar 27, 2013 5:21:35 PM 
>> 
>>  
>> Shane,
>> 
>> 
>> Take Joe's comments with a grain of salt. True Zen needs no teacher, no 
>> 'sitting', no temple. These may help especially those who tend to not have 
>> the personality to do things on their own,  but they are not essential. 
>> After all Buddha himself had none of these. True Zen has nothing to do with 
>> any of this. It is simply the realization of the true nature of what is 
>> always right around us including ourselves...
>> 
>> Edgar
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 27, 2013, at 11:58 AM, Joe wrote:
>> 
>>>  
>>> Shane,
>>> 
>>> Good to meet you here.
>>> 
>>> "Who am I" is a famous method of practice. Whether we call it a koan or not 
>>> is not too important.
>>> 
>>> Koans are usually cases or incidents from the doings of famous Ch'an or Zen 
>>> masters. The student is asked to "bore into" the koan, and be changed by 
>>> it, so as to become it, and to be able to demonstrate the spirit or 
>>> "content" of the koan to the teacher, when asked to do so.
>>> 
>>> When working on "Who am I", I think one can sit down and just intensely 
>>> desire to know the answer to this, without letting anything else seep in 
>>> around the corners while we inquire. One need not repeat anything in the 
>>> imagination or to the mind's ear. Just inquire intensely, while we relax 
>>> *deeply*.
>>> 
>>> Another classic way to practice WITH this is instead as a "hua-tou", 
>>> Chinese for "head of a word". By "head" is meant the very beginning, before 
>>> it becomes a word. So, to turn "Who am I" into a hua-tou, one uses just the 
>>> "Who", or, better, the first sound that the word "Who" begins with: "wh", 
>>> which is like "h", but it sounds perhaps like "ha", or a choked-off 
>>> syllable before the word can get said and be recognized as a word. This 
>>> "wh" can fill your whole meditation, if one does not separate oneself from 
>>> it. If you find you are separated, it's EASY to return immediately to "wh". 
>>> In this way, one thought, or one mind-intention, can last for many minutes 
>>> or longer.
>>> 
>>> Hua-tou and koan are just a couple ways of practice, though. There are 
>>> many. Usually we stick with just one for some while: months, years, etc., 
>>> and become intimate with it. The methods bring us closer to our original 
>>> mind. Sometimes the original mind SUDDENLY manifests itself as everything 
>>> else drops away. This is the famous "Awakening" of Zen. It is nothing 
>>> special, but what a shake-up it causes! Some say it is just coming back to 
>>> our true home. And I agree.
>>> 
>>> I hope you have a teacher and sangha to practice with, as well as practice 
>>> at home. A teacher and sangha are essential to learn the methods correctly, 
>>> and there is no alternative to this that really works and is safe. Some 
>>> people mistakenly think that they can teach themselves. That doesn't work.
>>> 
>>> --Joe
>>> 
>>> > "shepherdspie1962" <shepherdspie1962@...> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > In general 'shepherds pies' are gender neutral, but in this case it is a 
>>> > 'he'...and his name is not stephen...haha...thanks again for the 
>>> > thoughtful replies...I will try to practice more and create concepts 
>>> > less...BTW, someone mentioned koans...the priest of the zen group I went 
>>> > to recently said he repeats the phrase "who am I" as a form of 
>>> > koan/mantra while sitting...hmmm...not sure that really made sense to me 
>>> > as one could probably just repeat an actual mantra...and not sure if "who 
>>> > am I" is really a Koan either...but to each his own...i suppose the 
>>> > answer is always more doing and less thinking...shane
>>> >
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to