Edgar,
Zen practice and Zen realization take up the former; Science takes up the
latter. I take up both. You take up space. ;-)
--Joe
PS And there's no "but" about it, it's simply so. "And" would be the proper
conjunction. Unless you're making some editorial comment, again. Anyway, give
it some thought.
> Edgar Owen <edgarowen@...> wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> Yes, that's right. Buddha Nature itself is simple because it is formless, but
> the world of forms that arises within it is endlessly complicated...
>
> Edgar
>
>
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 10:40 PM, Joe wrote:
>
> > Edgar, Bob,
> >
> > It may be empty, but that doesn't keep the Ch'an masters of old from also
> > calling it "Marvelous", and even "miraculous", if the translation is apt.
> >
> > Buddha Nature is completely uncomplicated, but the family relations among
> > the 10000 Things are quite a network, and are all taking us back to our
> > original home, if we have the eye.
> >
> > --Joe
------------------------------------
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
