Merle,

IMO only experience is real, and by that 'experience' I mean sensory experience 
(sight, sound, touch, smell, taste).

That's it.  That's all.

...Bill!

--- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
>  bill..thank you for your clarification...so what is NOT an illusion 
> bill?...and what is real in your world?...merle
> 
> 
>   
> Merle,
> 
> Sure...as long as you tie it back to zen it's fair game as far as I'm 
> concerned.  What this article is talking about is what Buddhism calls 
> 'suffering'.
> 
> Western medicine tries to alleviate it by prescribing medications.
> 
> Most religions try to alleviate it by prescribing faith in God.
> 
> Art, music, work, activities of all sorts, etc.. help alleviate it by having 
> you concentrate on something else. 
> 
> Zen IMO tries to alleviate it by helping you experience these are delusive.
> 
> ...Bill! 
> 
> --- In [email protected], Merle Lester <merlewiitpom@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> >  i thought this was a good article as to what bill talks 
> > about..illusions... hence zen appropriate..correct me if i am 
> > incorrect...bill...
> > merle
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Worried Sick
> > >Expectations can make you ill. Fear can make you fragile. Understanding 
> > >the nocebo effect may help prevent this painful phenomenon.
> > >By Megan Scudellari | July 1, 2013
> > >© BRYAN SATALINO
> > >Something strange was happening in New Zealand. In the fall of 2007, 
> > >pharmacies across the country had begun dispensing a new formulation of 
> > >Eltroxinâ€"the only thyroid hormone replacement drug approved and paid 
> > >for by the government and used by tens of thousands of New Zealanders 
> > >since 1973. Within months, reports of side effects began trickling in to 
> > >the government’s health-care monitoring agency. These included 
> > >known side effects of the drug, such as lethargy, joint pain, and 
> > >depression, as well as symptoms not normally associated with the drug or 
> > >disease, including eye pain, itching, and nausea. Then, the following 
> > >summer, the floodgates opened: in the 18 months following the release of 
> > >the new tablets, the rate of Eltroxin adverse event reporting rose nearly 
> > >2,000-fold.1
> > >The strange thing was, the active ingredient in the drug, thyroxine, was 
> > >exactly the same. Laboratory testing proved that the new formulation was 
> > >bioequivalent to the old one. The only change was that the drugmaker, 
> > >GlaxoSmithKline, had moved its manufacturing process from Canada to 
> > >Germany, and in the process altered the drug’s inert qualities, 
> > >including the tablets’ size, color, and markings.
> > >So why were people getting sick? In June, it turned out, newspapers and TV 
> > >stations around the country had begun to directly attribute the reported 
> > >adverse effects to the changes in the drug. Following widespread coverage 
> > >of the issue, more and more patients reported adverse events to the 
> > >government. And the areas of the country with the most intense media 
> > >coverage had the highest rates of reported ill effects, suggesting that 
> > >perhaps a little social persuasion was at play.
> > >â€Å"Nocebo†(meaning â€Å"I shall harmâ€) is the dastardly 
> > >sibling of placebo (â€Å"I shall pleaseâ€).
> > >But Eltroxin takers were not making up their symptoms. The feelings were 
> > >real, but in the vast majority of cases they could not be attributed to 
> > >the drug’s pharmacological properties. The patients were victims of 
> > >the nocebo effect.
> > >â€Å"Nocebo†(meaning â€Å"I shall harmâ€) is the dastardly 
> > >sibling of placebo (â€Å"I shall pleaseâ€). In a placebo response, a 
> > >sham medication or procedure has a beneficial health effect as a result of 
> > >a patient’s expectation. Sugar pills, for example, can powerfully 
> > >improve depression when the patient believes them to be antidepressants. 
> > >But, researchers are learning, the reverse phenomenon is also common: 
> > >negative expectations can actually cause harm.
> > >When Parkinson’s patients undergoing deep brain stimulation were 
> > >told that their brain pacemaker was going to be turned off, symptoms of 
> > >their illness became more pronounced, even when the pacemaker was left 
> > >on.2 When people with and without lactose intolerance were asked to 
> > >ingest lactose, but were actually given glucose, 44 percent of those with 
> > >lactose intolerance and 26 percent of those without it still complained of 
> > >stomach pain.3 And men treated for an enlarged prostate with a commonly 
> > >prescribed drug and told that the drug â€Å"may cause erectile 
> > >dysfunction, decreased libido, [and] problems of ejaculation,†but 
> > >that these effects were â€Å"uncommon,†were more than twice as 
> > >likely to experience impotence as those who were not so informed.4
> > >On paper, it sounds like psychobabbleâ€"a negative effect caused by a 
> > >sham treatment based on a patient’s expectationsâ€"but it is a 
> > >real biochemical and physiological process, involving pain and stress 
> > >pathways in the brain. And mounting evidence suggests that the nocebo 
> > >effect is having a substantial negative impact on clinical research, 
> > >medicine, and health.
> > >â€Å"Nocebo is at least as important as the placebo effect and may be 
> > >more widespread,†says Ted Kaptchuk, director of Harvard’s 
> > >Program in Placebo Studies at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in 
> > >Boston, Massachusetts.
> > >Now that this pernicious phenomenon is starting to receive the recognition 
> > >it deserves, the question is: What exactly can be done about it?
> > >Evil effects
> > >ALLERGIC TO NOCEBO
> > >© BRYAN SATALINO
> > >According to several recent studies, pain and itch appear to be especially 
> > >susceptible to verbal suggestion. Recently, researchers in the Netherlands 
> > >demonstrated that people who are told that a stimulus will cause itch feel 
> > >the itch more intensely than those told that the stimulus is unlikely to 
> > >cause itch. The finding could have implications for chronic itch 
> > >conditions, says first author Antoinette van Laarhoven of Radboud 
> > >University Nijmegen Medical Center. â€Å"More knowledge about nocebo 
> > >effects on itch can give us some targets to reduce [those effects].â€
> > >Also last year, in a curious study of nocebo and rectal pain, a team at 
> > >University Hospital Essen in Germany managed to recruit healthy volunteers 
> > >to undergo multiple rectal balloon distensions, a procedure in which a 
> > >balloon is inserted into the rectum and slowly inflatedâ€"in this case, 
> > >until the moment it becomes painful. The procedures were exactly the same 
> > >in control and nocebo groups, but there was a 20 percent increase in pain 
> > >ratings among patients who had been told that doctors had observed an 
> > >increase in pain sensitivity in response to repeated distensions. Those 
> > >individuals who experienced more pain also had elevated levels of 
> > >cortisol, again linking nocebo to anxiety. â€Å"We could show that a 
> > >nocebo effect may be induced even by mere information,†says Sven 
> > >Benson, an author on the paper.
> > >Another area of health that researchers suspect may be affected by nocebo 
> > >is the increased incidence of asthma and allergies. â€Å"It’s 
> > >certainly possible,†says Manfred Schedlowski, who studies placebo and 
> > >the immune system at University Hospital Essen. â€Å"From experimental 
> > >data, we know an allergic reaction can be conditioned.â€
> > >In an oft-cited case from 1886, John Mackenzie, a surgeon in Baltimore, 
> > >described how he’d â€Å"obtained an artificial rose of such 
> > >exquisite workmanship that it presented a perfect counterfeit of the 
> > >original,†then exposed a woman with severe rose allergy to the fake 
> > >flower. The woman, not knowing it was fake, had a full-blown allergic 
> > >reaction, including a running nose, swollen nostrils, and a tight chest.12 
> > >Similarly, people allergic to dogs may begin sneezing when they simply see 
> > >a dog across the way. Researchers have even shown that guinea pigs can be 
> > >conditioned to release histamine, causing a local immune response, when 
> > >presented with just an odor stimulus.
> > >But the link between nocebo and allergy is far from concrete. 
> > >â€Å"We’re in such a primitive state of understanding this 
> > >phenomenon, particularly in a clinically oriented way, that we just need 
> > >to do more research,†says bioethicist Frank Miller of the National 
> > >Institutes of Health. 
> > >In 1997, Fabrizio Benedetti, a neurophysiologist at the University of 
> > >Turin Medical School in Italy, was busy mapping the biochemical pathways 
> > >involved in placebo responses when he performed a simple study that 
> > >revealed a distinct neural mechanism driving the body’s nocebo 
> > >response. He gave consenting postoperative patients reporting mild pain an 
> > >injection that they were told would increase their pain within 30 minutes. 
> > >The injection was either saline solution or proglumide, which blocks a 
> > >hormone implicated in pain hypersensitivity and associated with anxiety. 
> > >Neither substance actually causes any discomfort.
> > >When saline was injected, patients experienced increased pain. When 
> > >proglumide was injected, they had no pain increaseâ€"the nocebo effect 
> > >was absent.5 In one fell swoop, Benedetti identified a biochemical 
> > >reaction responsible for the nocebo response, and he showed that it could 
> > >be blocked.
> > >It was Benedetti’s work that finally convinced 
> > >physician-bioethicist Howard Brody that the nocebo effectâ€"allegedly 
> > >first mentioned in the scientific literature in 1961 by physician Walter 
> > >Kennedy, who called the phenomenon a â€Å"quality inherent in the 
> > >patient rather than in the remedyâ€â€"was real.
> > >â€Å"For many years, I dismissed the value of the term 
> > >‘nocebo,’ †says Brody, chair of family medicine 
> > >and director of the Institute for the Medical Humanities at the University 
> > >of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, who first began studying the placebo 
> > >effect in the 1970s. He and others had long assumed that nocebo and 
> > >placebo were two sides of one coin, that the same process in the brain 
> > >supported both illusory effectsâ€"one was just manifested as a positive 
> > >outcome, while the other caused harm. But after reading Benedetti’s 
> > >work, Brody changed his tune: â€Å"I received my comeuppance,†he 
> > >laughs.
> > >With that first biochemical evidence, others also began recognizing the 
> > >importance of nocebo, and a few inquiring minds began to study it. 
> > >Nevertheless, compared to placebo, the nocebo effect remains vastly 
> > >understudied: a PubMed database search will turn up more than 163,000 
> > >publications on â€Å"placebo†and fewer than 200 on 
> > >â€Å"nocebo.†Of those, only a few dozen are empirical studies; most 
> > >are reviews. â€Å"The placebo phenomenon has a tremendous fascination 
> > >for the publicâ€"a gee-whiz thing with a positive spin, a way to be 
> > >healthy without taking drugs,†says Frank Miller, a bioethicist at the 
> > >National Institutes of Health. â€Å"But nobody is very enthusiastic 
> > >about the nocebo phenomenon.â€
> > >In addition, the nocebo effect has become notoriously difficult to study. 
> > >Few institutional review boards will allow scientists to induce pain in 
> > >their subjects, and some even refuse to let researchers mislead their 
> > >volunteers. â€Å"My ethics committee will not allow me to do it,†
> > >says Paul Enck, a psychologist at the University of Tübingen in 
> > >Germany, â€Å"unless I tell the subjects that I am deceiving 
> > >themâ€â€"a requirement that obviously defeats the purpose of the 
> > >deception. â€Å"It makes life really miserable as a [nocebo] 
> > >researcher,†says Enck.
> > >The tragedy of this lack of investigation, researchers assert, is that 
> > >controlled trials about the nocebo effect are needed to further understand 
> > >and prevent nocebo’s insidious effects on medicine and research. 
> > >â€Å"In clinical drug trials, the placebo effectâ€"and now we know 
> > >the nocebo effectâ€"can be really, really large,†says Manfred 
> > >Schedlowski, a clinical researcher at the University Hospital Essen in 
> > >Germany. â€Å"This hinders the development of new drugs.â€
> > >In December 2012, for example, a meta-analysis revealed the shockingly 
> > >large impact of the nocebo effect in clinical trials: in 18 fibromyalgia 
> > >drug studies, 11 percent of 3,546 patients in the placebo armâ€"meaning 
> > >they were receiving a completely inert substanceâ€"dropped out of the 
> > >study because of side effects including dizziness and nausea.6 Other 
> > >studies have calculated that nocebo effects cause between 4 and 26 percent 
> > >of patients taking placebo to leave a clinical trial because of side 
> > >effects from an inert treatment.
> > >The nocebo effect may also have a worrisome effect on vaccine use. In 
> > >2011, researchers at the French vaccine manufacturer Sanofi Pasteur 
> > >analyzed 33,275 vaccine side-effect reports and found that doctors and 
> > >patients preferentially report disease-specific side effects, such as 
> > >measles-like rash following measles immunization, even when the vaccine 
> > >contains only proteins, sugars, or killed organisms that won’t 
> > >cause symptoms of the disease. The nocebo effect has â€Å"great 
> > >potential†to exacerbate rumors and fears, and to cause a vaccine 
> > >crisis similar to the Eltroxin events in New Zealand, the authors write.7
> > >But the most common place where the nocebo effect makes an appearance is 
> > >in everyday visits to clinics and hospitals. â€Å"In places like primary 
> > >care, people are swimming in placebo and nocebo effects,†says 
> > >Kaptchuk.
> > >Thomas D’Amico, chief of thoracic surgery at Duke University 
> > >Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina, says that even before he heard 
> > >the term nocebo effect, he was aware of it in the clinic. 
> > >â€Å"I’ve listened to some well-respected colleagues give 
> > >information [to a patient], and I thought, ‘Gosh, I know the 
> > >operation and even I wouldn’t want it,’†he says. 
> > >â€Å"There’s too much detail and too much emphasis about things 
> > >that could go wrong.†Measuring the effect of such detail on an 
> > >individual patient is hard to quantify, he says, but fear and distress 
> > >before an operation has been associated with slow postoperative recovery 
> > >and delayed wound healing.
> > >Nuts and bolts
> > >© BRYAN SATALINODespite the disproportionate amount of effort put into 
> > >placebo research, since Benedetti’s 1997 discovery there’s 
> > >been an uptick in the funding and time devoted to investigating the 
> > >mechanisms behind nocebo, with impressive results. â€Å"Without a doubt, 
> > >there’s been a level of research and a sophistication of research 
> > >that has made a quantum jump in the last decade or so,†says Brody.
> > >In 2007, for example, Benedetti discovered that the 
> > >hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in the brain, an important part of the 
> > >body’s â€Å"stress system,†is activated during a nocebo 
> > >response, as detected by an increase in the secretion of the hormones 
> > >ACTH, from the pituitary gland, and cortisol, from the adrenal gland, both 
> > >markers of anxiety.8
> > >Then, in 2008, Kaptchuk and colleagues at Harvard performed the first 
> > >brain-imaging study of the nocebo effect. After conditioning healthy 
> > >volunteers to expect pain on their right forearm, they watched as the 
> > >hippocampus lit up when people experienced pain from a sham acupuncture 
> > >device.
> > >Through Benedetti’s and Kaptchuk’s work, it is now clear 
> > >that a person’s expectation of pain can induce anticipatory 
> > >anxiety, triggering the activation of cholecystokinin, the hormone that 
> > >Benedetti blocked with proglumide. Cholecystokinin-mediated pathways in 
> > >turn facilitate pain transmission, which occurs in specific areas of the 
> > >brain. The finding does not coincide with what is know about the 
> > >biochemistry of the placebo effectâ€"which seems to be at least partly 
> > >regulated by opioid releaseâ€"suggesting the two phenomena have 
> > >distinct mechanisms.
> > >â€Å"Even if placebo and nocebo are on a continuum of expectation, 
> > >different mechanisms kick in at different points along that 
> > >continuum,†says Tor Wager, director of the Cognitive and Affective 
> > >Control Laboratory at the University of Colorado, Boulder, who studies the 
> > >brain pathways underlying pain.
> > >Last year, Kaptchuk and colleagues added a surprising twist when they 
> > >discovered nocebo can occur without conscious awareness. His team applied 
> > >either high or low heat pain to the arms of 20 volunteers while showing 
> > >them an image of one of two faces. The researchers then showed the 
> > >volunteers the faces again, but with identical, moderate heat applied to 
> > >their arms each time and the faces displayed at a much faster pace, 
> > >preventing conscious recognition. When exposed to the faces associated 
> > >with high pain levels, even without conscious awareness, the volunteers 
> > >felt more pain.9 â€Å"It was a really risky experiment,†says 
> > >Kaptchuk. â€Å"We were really surprised. We couldn’t believe it, 
> > >actually.â€
> > >The biochemical and physiological discoveries about nocebo have made the 
> > >phenomenon more credible in the medical community. â€Å"These brain 
> > >measures provide objective evidence on the physical system implementing 
> > >these squishy, fuzzy changes in emotion and expectation,†says Wager.
> > >Most nocebo research to date, however, focuses on basic mechanisms, not on 
> > >how to deal with the phenomenon in the clinic. â€Å"Translational 
> > >research has been a stepchild in scientific investigations of this 
> > >phenomenon,†says Miller. Understanding the mechanism is important, 
> > >but at the end of the day, he says, the medical community needs a solution 
> > >to the problem.
> > >Controlling for nocebo
> > >In 1987, a team of doctors in Ontario, Canada, suspected that medical 
> > >consent forms might actually cause harm. Using the chance occurrence of 
> > >two different consent forms being used for the same drug trial, they 
> > >compared patient reactions to the wording of the forms. The trial pitted 
> > >aspirin against sulfinpyrazone, a medicine already approved to treat gout, 
> > >as a treatment for chest pain. Patients at two of the three centers 
> > >hosting the trial were informed that â€Å"side effects are not 
> > >anticipated beyond occasional gastrointestinal irritation and, rarely, 
> > >skin rash.†At the third center, patients’ consent forms did 
> > >not mention gastrointestinal effects. Seventy-six patients out of 399 (19 
> > >percent) given the first consent form that mentioned GI irritation 
> > >withdrew from the study, citing GI issues, compared to just 5 out of 156 
> > >(3 percent) who received the second form.10
> > >With the nocebo effect, doctors are caught between a rock and a hard 
> > >place: their medical duty to primum non nocere, â€Å"First, do no 
> > >harm,†and the ethical and regulatory obligation of informed consent. 
> > >What do you do when informed consent leads to harm?
> > >Last year, Kaptchuk and colleague Rebecca Wells, also at Harvard Medical 
> > >School, sparked a debate on this topic in the pages of the American 
> > >Journal of Bioethics. They proposed a middle ground called contextualized 
> > >informed consent. Doctors, they suggested, might choose not to tell 
> > >patients every last side effect of a treatment in great detail, but 
> > >instead provide information to a patient tailored to his or her level of 
> > >anxiety, such as leaving out nonspecific side effectsâ€"those that are 
> > >not a direct result of the pharmacological action of the 
> > >drugâ€"including headache, nausea, and fatigue.
> > >Nocebo is at least as important as the placebo effect and may be more 
> > >widespread.â€"­ Ted Kaptchuk, Program in Placebo Studies,
> > >>Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard University
> > >But the idea of not informing patients of all possible side effects is 
> > >anathema to some ethicists. â€Å"I certainly don’t think that we 
> > >should be rethinking whether informed consent should be a basic norm in 
> > >clinical practice,†says Miller. Such a practice could promote 
> > >mistrust in the health-care system and defeat recent efforts towards 
> > >increased transparency. It may not be possible to have valid informed 
> > >consent with no chance of the nocebo phenomenon, Miller admits, but he 
> > >proposes two alterative techniques.
> > >One is to frame information about treatments positively rather than 
> > >negatively. A 1996 study from the University of Ottawa in Canada, for 
> > >example, described the benefits and risks of a vaccine to 292 people, who 
> > >had never been previously immunized, using tw
>




------------------------------------

Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are 
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to