and yes creation KG..what a lovely word..coupled with create and creativity it dragged us from that original swampy pond....
remember when you were a fish and struggling to breathe the breath of life on land...?... how far back to you wish to travel..a single cell..is that then the so called original buddha nature... or must we be human to experience the original source... the original face..the buddha being... what knowledge tells us that the fish and the tree do not have buddha nature?... we are all one and the same being, vegetable, mineral and....the human... all one.. all one and the same creature.. the original soup mixture.. so without creation and the creative process we could never evolve to being human..huh?... now tell me i'm delusional... as i struggling to cope with the lack of awareness from some human beings on this planet... merle "Most people" of such delusional persuasion also use 'creation' as a noun. KG On 8/25/2013 1:01 AM, [email protected] wrote: >Your definition is meaningless though and certainly not in accord with how >most people define 'God'. The universe works just fine without such a belief. >Why paint legs on a snake? > >Mike > > >Sent from Yahoo! Mail for iPad >
