Thanks Fudo!

... and

Fudo Wrote:
So there are some Buddhist practitioners who do not agree with Alex's 
statement (of course this makes them incorrect).

*Them* being the "practitioners who do not agree with Alex" -- naturally ;>


Rod

P.s.
Sorry, Alex, I couldn't resist.  When it comes to humor, sometimes the needs of 
the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one (nod to spock). I hope you 
don't take my crack too personally (... and this is of course an ally-oop to 
Al, who I hope will just let it hang there :)   

Oof!  The doube-entendre's are killing me!

I shoulda been a comedian...



-----Original Message-----
From: Kyukyo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 4:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Zen] attachment



Rod Scholl wrote:

>Alex wrote:
>When Buddhist practitioners talk about attachment, it
>only refers to the attachment to self. 
>
>
>Well that suprises me.  Can anyone practitioners support/refute this teaching 
>from Alex?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Rod
>
>
>  
>
Dear Rod,

This can be refuted on two levels.

First, Buddhists to not think any one thing...some Buddhists may mean 
what Alex says they mean when they use the word attachment, but not all 
Buddhist practitioners would agree the sun rises in the morning. What is 
the Christian belief about whether or not the host in communion is the 
actual body of Christ?...there is no one view. This statement in untrue 
in its sweeping generality.

Second' by typing Buddhism and attachment into a search engine this is 
the first quote I came up with.
"

  

*ATTACHMENT*

 

*"Grasping at things can only yield one of two results:
Either the thing you are grasping at disappears, or you yourself disappear.
It is only a matter of which occurs first." *
/Goenka/


        *SOME DEFINITIONS*

It may be important to know the following definitions and descriptions 
in order to understand the problems we have with attachment, and make 
sense about the ways in which we can deal with them.

*ATTACHMENT*
Definition: Exaggerated not wanting to be separated from someone or 
something. (Exact opposite of Aversion) Because the label of "pleasant" 
is very relative and based upon limited information, Attachment includes 
an aspect of exaggeration or "projection".

Near "enemy" (or not to be confused with): Real appreciation, love and 
compassion.
Opposite: Wanting to be separated from someone or something: aversion.
Main quality: exaggeration of positive qualities, which can only lead to 
disappointment. Falling in love will usually fit very well in this 
category."

So there are some Buddhist practitioners who do not agree with Alex's 
statement (of course this makes them incorrect).

Be Well

Fudo






Noble Eightfold Path: Right View, Right Intention, Right Speech, Right  Action, 
Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, Right Concentration, Right Livelihood 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
It is better to give....
Especially when giving to a child in poverty.
Click here to meet a child you can help.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/uq3f6C/hJlJAA/i1hLAA/S27xlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Noble Eightfold Path: Right View, Right Intention, Right Speech, Right  Action, 
Right Effort, Right Mindfulness, Right Concentration, Right Livelihood 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ZenForum/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to