Hi, Sorry for my delay but I needed to test this on production.
The failover (back) went quite well, but I see some problems still. - Not all cluster start up well, most of the time 1-2 don't start and need to be manually started. - The ping didn't fix it - It seems that a cluster needs to be started and stopped when it doesn't accept any connection. So the ping is no solution in my case, anyway I think it should be build in. Is this some usefull information ? Thanks, Matt 2015-08-02 11:37 GMT+02:00 Emilio Campos <emilio.campos.mar...@gmail.com>: > Please confirm if ping solves your issue. A similar behaviour was found in > support channel and was solved with ping. If so we will add this for the > next zen CE release. > > Regards > > El 31/07/2015 13:40, "Matt ." <yamakasi....@gmail.com> escribió: >> >> Hi, >> >> Any update on this how Zen handles this normally or maybe should/could do >> ? >> >> Thanks! >> >> 2015-07-29 23:24 GMT+02:00 Matt . <yamakasi....@gmail.com>: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Yes I can try ping, but why isn't this default in Zen ? >> > >> > I thought it was or should be at least. >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > 2015-07-29 22:32 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Chateau <mathieu.chat...@lotp.fr>: >> >> Tou can configure the switch to send all traffic for this mac to both >> >> ports, >> >> always. It make it more a hub for this mac: >> >> >> >> mac address-table static 0300.5e01.0101 vlan 200 interface >> >> TenGigabitEthernet1/4 >> >> TenGigabitEthernet1/5 >> >> >> >> >> >> A bit dumb, just time to find root cause. >> >> >> >> >> >> tcpdump while this happening may help >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Cordialement, >> >> Mathieu CHATEAU >> >> http://www.lotp.fr >> >> >> >> 2015-07-29 15:46 GMT+02:00 Emilio Campos >> >> <emilio.campos.mar...@gmail.com>: >> >>> >> >>> Try with ping. Some network devices requiere this kind of packets in >> >>> order >> >>> to update the arp table. >> >>> >> >>> El 29/07/2015 10:58, "Matt ." <yamakasi....@gmail.com> escribió: >> >>>> >> >>>> Hi, >> >>>> >> >>>> I have checked out some extra settings I might need to make, but it >> >>>> should not matter. Do you have any idea yet ? >> >>>> >> >>>> 2015-07-28 15:21 GMT+02:00 Matt . <yamakasi....@gmail.com>: >> >>>> > Hi, >> >>>> > >> >>>> > As far as I can see Layer 2, but this device is doing Layer3. >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > 2015-07-28 15:11 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Chateau >> >>>> > <mathieu.chat...@lotp.fr>: >> >>>> >> Is it only a layer2 or layer3 (routing) too ? >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> Cordialement, >> >>>> >> Mathieu CHATEAU >> >>>> >> http://www.lotp.fr >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> 2015-07-28 14:44 GMT+02:00 Matt . <yamakasi....@gmail.com>: >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> Hi, >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> OK thanks for the update. >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> I see this happening on Cisco Switches, at this moment a 3030. >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> Cheers, >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> Matt >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> 2015-07-28 14:38 GMT+02:00 Mathieu Chateau >> >>>> >>> <mathieu.chat...@lotp.fr>: >> >>>> >>> > Gratuitous arp may not be learned if send as multicast. >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > I know that on Nokia firewalls (now Checkpoint) you have a >> >>>> >>> > checkbox >> >>>> >>> > to >> >>>> >>> > accept mac address learning this way. >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > Check with wireshark/tcpdump what's happening (send/received) >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > Mac address should be the virtual one and so does not change. >> >>>> >>> > Only switch have to learn that the virtual mac is now on >> >>>> >>> > another >> >>>> >>> > port. >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > What is your switch/router model ? Manageable ? >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > Cordialement, >> >>>> >>> > Mathieu CHATEAU >> >>>> >>> > http://www.lotp.fr >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > 2015-07-28 13:56 GMT+02:00 Matt . <yamakasi....@gmail.com>: >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> Hi, >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> When I do a failover I still need to do >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> "clear ip cache" >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> to make it all working well again, especially for my Farm IP's >> >>>> >>> >> where >> >>>> >>> >> my clients talk to. >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> A low arp table is not advisable, but Gratuitous ARP which Zen >> >>>> >>> >> should >> >>>> >>> >> do, doesn't work that well ? >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> Please advise. >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> Thanks, >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> Matt >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> >>> >> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list >> >>>> >>> >> Zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> >> >>>> >>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > _______________________________________________ >> >>>> >>> > Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list >> >>>> >>> > Zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support >> >>>> >>> > >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> >>> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list >> >>>> >>> Zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> >> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list >> >>>> >> Zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>>> _______________________________________________ >> >>>> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list >> >>>> Zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net >> >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>> >> >>> _______________________________________________ >> >>> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list >> >>> Zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net >> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list >> >> Zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net >> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list >> Zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list > Zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Zenloadbalancer-support mailing list Zenloadbalancer-support@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/zenloadbalancer-support
