dschrock wrote: > > F350 wrote: > > Hi, > > I had the same problem. We have several edge routers to monitor and polling > > bgp routes was very slow and consumes a large amount of CPU. To remedy > > this, i created a view in the snmp conf on the cisco routers masking all > > routing tables. Polling other protocol routing tables like ISIS or OSPF is > > not important for us but maybe with the views u can already mask only bgp > > routes instead of all the routes. Did u checked this up? > > > > Regards > > > interesting... i hadn't thought about that type of solution. > > thanks for the idea. Have any links on setting this up so I can speed up the > search and implementation process?
Well, I removed ipRouteEntry from the SNMP view and the routers are now being modeled correctly, sans routing information. I am still going to try to tweak it to give me the local and OSPF routes, but as of now this will at least get us interfaces. Thanks. ------------------------ Daniel Schrock -------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=8764#8764 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
