Greetings, all.

I'm running zenoss on a 32-bit SuSE 9.3 installation, monitoring two separate 
64-bit Windows Server 2003 boxes using SNMP-Informant.  Everything seems to be 
going fine, except for one thing.  I've created a copy of the default 
performance Template for each box, and have added an additional Data Source to 
track Committed Bytes for the purposes of alerting and graphing.  I've added 
the exact same data source and graph definitions on each machine, but I'm 
getting weird results from one of them.

For each server/template, I have defined the data source thusly:
Name: memoryCommittedBytes
SourceType: SNMP
Enabled: True
OID: 1.3.6.1.4.1.9600.1.1.2.4.0

Data Point:
Name: memoryCommittedBytes
Type: GAUGE
Line Type: AREA
RPN: 1,*
RRD Min: (blank)
RRD Max: (blank)
Limit: -1
Color: (blank)
Format: %0.2lf%s
Create Cmd: (blank)

I created a graph for each machine for committed bytes.
Name: Committed Bytes
Data Sources: memoryCommittedBytes_memoryCommittedBytes
Height: 100
Width: 500
Units: bytes
Line Width: 1
Log: False
Base 1024: True
Stacked: False
Min Y: 0
Max Y: 16000000000 (that's 16GB)
Has Summary: True
Custom: (blank)

Now, on one server, this works great.  On the other, I'm getting negative 
values shown on the graph.  I've side-by-side compared my data source, point 
and graph definitions and they are identical. 

I've used snmpwalk to query the OID directly, and I get sane values when I do 
this, so I can't figure out how zenoss is getting/reporting negative numbers!

On the server that's working, I have 4GB RAM installed and committed bytes 
rarely is above 1.5GB.  On the server that is insane, I have 8GB RAM installed 
and we are usually running at 7.5GB committed bytes.

Anyone have any ideas for me?

Thanks!

------------------------
 Max Edison




-------------------- m2f --------------------

Read this topic online here:
http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=11292#11292

-------------------- m2f --------------------



_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users

Reply via email to