Appreciate the comments and would greatly look forward to seeing this layer-2 managment coming to life. If there is anything I can help with let me know. survey submitted.
edahl wrote: > We are thinking about either layer-2 management (modeling, > visualization and monitoring) or netflow for the next release. Which > would you like to have more? Would CDP and bridge tables get us a > reasonable map? Seems like a good place to start. > > Here is a link to the survey that we sent out in the new letter about > the issue. > > http://tinyurl.com/2slpwt > > -EAD > > On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:09 PM, morianos wrote: > > > > Extremely fond of the Network Map based on Layer 3 routing > > information, any way to do something similar using layer 2 bridging > > tables? like something one might see in a layer 2 wireless point to > > multipoint setup. > > > > [Shocked] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > zenoss-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > zenoss-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users -------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=12773#12773 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
