How broad is the support for LLDP? Looks like we can collect it
though SNMP which makes it pretty easy to support.
-EAD
On Nov 6, 2007, at 8:03 AM, James Pulver wrote:
I think LLDP(IIRC the name) would be better than CDP as many newer
switches only support LLDP... Though both would be best.
--
James Pulver
Information Technology Area Supervisor
LEPP Computer Group
Cornell University
Erik A. Dahl wrote:
We are thinking about either layer-2 management (modeling,
visualization and monitoring) or netflow for the next release.
Which would you like to have more? Would CDP and bridge tables get
us a reasonable map? Seems like a good place to start.
Here is a link to the survey that we sent out in the new letter
about the issue.
http://tinyurl.com/2slpwt
-EAD
On Nov 5, 2007, at 8:09 PM, morianos wrote:
Extremely fond of the Network Map based on Layer 3 routing
information, any way to do something similar using layer 2
bridging tables? like something one might see in a layer 2
wireless point to multipoint setup.
[Shocked]
-------------------- m2f --------------------
Read this topic online here:
http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=12758#12758
-------------------- m2f --------------------
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
