Thanks for your feedback. :) I am using SNMP for modeling. And I do already have zenoss.snmp.IpServiceMap specified in the parent class.
I'm not using zenoss.portscan.IpServiceMap, but the reason for this is mainly because a) I'm guessing this does exactly what the name suggests (ie, a portscan), and b) if that assumption is correct, I don't want to set off a raft of alarms with the network monitoring folks. So I went back and created a new device. Interesting thing is 3 services showed up in the OS tab. One of those was one of my non-standard ports. But there should have been at least 3 of my other non-standard port definitions showing up there as well. I'm not entirely sure why the one showed up and the others did not. They've all got monitoring set to True. The only difference I can think of is some fixing up I'd done recently (mentioned in another thread where I was trying to get rid of KeyError in zenhub.log), and after that, I'd gone back to the one service definition, changed the monitoring from True to False (and Saved), then switched it immediately back from False to True (and Saved). I hadn't done that with the others, because I didn't see any changes to the devices being monitored with that one service I'd changed). So I'm going to try a couple things, experiment here and there, see if anything shakes loose. I haven't been awake long (late night last night) so I might be mis-remembering some stuff I've already done. :P -------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://community.zenoss.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=16832#16832 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
