Can anyone from Zenoss proper weigh in on this? There really seems to be misunderstands about what auto-discover does and Zenoss' behavior is not my idea of how other management systems define auto-discover.
Matt mwoodling wrote: > Here's how I think auto-discovery should work (basically, this is the HP > Network Node Manager discovery model): > > Any subnet that has zAutoDiscover set to True should be periodically scanned > for live IPs and, at my option, be modeled by Zenoss. Ideally, I would like > Zenoss to only add devices that have a particular SNMP config (correct > community names in SNMP v1, for example) and Zenoss should completely ignore > all other devices. I would also like Zenoss to be configured to limit what > IP ranges can be discovered at all. Ideally, devices would be automatically > placed in appropriate classes based on the format of their device name. The > nice thing about this approach is that, if I control the SNMP configuration > of devices, discovery and classification is completely hands-off. > > Am I missing something? Can Zenoss do what I want (Core, Enterprise, Service > Provider)? > > Matt -------------------- m2f -------------------- Read this topic online here: http://forums.zenoss.com/viewtopic.php?p=29230#29230 -------------------- m2f -------------------- _______________________________________________ zenoss-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
