I believe you may have not understood (or I misunderstand) how the 
zEventClearClasses works - You can in the event mapping definition 
specify what classes clear this event (I believe that's how it works, 
though it may be the other way round - perhaps Matt Ray or Chet can 
clarify).

You can also have multiple mappings per class... ? Though there it gets 
wonky in my understanding as to whether being in the same class is 
enough to clear the event...
--
James Pulver
Information Technology Area Supervisor
LEPP Computer Group
Cornell University



nxumdon wrote, On 1/6/2009 4:46 PM:
> Hi
> We've got many APC UPS out in the field and they all send traps of various 
> types to our Zenoss system.  What I'm trying to do is configure event 
> correlation to automatically move events to the history as they are fixed.  
> 
> For example;
> 
> I've got an event class called UPS and in that a subclass called contacts.  
> I've mapped the two contact events (open and close) from one of the UPS' to 
> this contact subclass, set the open event to be of CLEAR status and it seems 
> to work just fine.  
> 
> The problem is that some UPS send contact alarms with a different OID, would 
> I need to duplicate this contacts subclass for this second OID?  
> 
> I'm not sure I understand how Zenoss users are supposed to use these event 
> classes if you have to create an entire class for each type of event you want 
> correlated.  Not sure I understand the point of classes if each just ends up 
> containing one up/down (open/close, pass/fail) pair.
> 
> Should I lump all my contact events into that one contact class, or do I have 
> to have seperate ones for each 'type' of contact alarm that may be sent?  
> 
> Is there no way to say, have this EVENT clear that EVENT and leave the use of 
> classes for management and organization of the HUNDREDS of trap types we get. 
>  If we have to set a subclass for each pair, that is somewhere around 200+ 
> subclasses!!!!!
> 
> Thanks
> 
> J
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------- m2f --------------------
> 
> Read this topic online here:
> http://forums.zenoss.com/viewtopic.php?p=29716#29716
> 
> -------------------- m2f --------------------
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> zenoss-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users
_______________________________________________
zenoss-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zenoss.org/mailman/listinfo/zenoss-users

Reply via email to