[email protected] said: > A straightforward behaviour for zmq_term would be to block until all the > sockets are deallocated -- each depending on it's SO_LINGER policy. > > (This could obviously result in deadlock on zmq_term, but that's beside > the point once again I think.) > > Thoughts?
For the record, I also agree; I think there is now consensus on what the correct semantics for zmq_close() and zmq_term() should be. Good discussion! -mato _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
