opening and closing lots of sockets is arguably bad. agreed.
not being able to close off a communication channel with
deterministic semantics is bad.
i don't understand the difficulty of being able to ask the publisher,
that is someone who has done zmq_send's, if all those sends have been
sent.
On Jul 8, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Chuck Remes wrote:
Flushing messages from closing sockets (or terminated contexts) is
only interesting at the final stage of an application's lifecycle.
Earlier in this thread someone mentioned that it's probably a buggy
"pattern" if one is opening and closing lots of sockets during a
program's lifetime. I agree.
cr
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
------------------
Andrew Hume (best -> Telework) +1 732-886-1886
[email protected] (Work) +1 973-360-8651
AT&T Labs - Research; member of USENIX and LOPSA
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
