Hi Martin,
> Kelly,
>
> Wouldn't it be possible to use NamedPipes for IPC on Windows?
That is likely the best interim solution, I always forget about it
since it wasn't available on 95/98 etc, guess I should get out of the stone
ages. :)
KB
> On 08/30/2010 10:49 PM, Jon Dyte wrote:
> > gonzalo diethelm wrote:
> >
> >> Would it make sense to implement the ipc endpoints under Windows by
> simply using tcp endpoints? Maybe it is already this way; if so,
> apologies. If not, it might ease migration of code using ipc endpoints.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > the trouble is the ipc string looks like "ipc:/path/to/file" how would
> > windows know what tcp ports to use?
> >
> > At the moment, it just errors for windows the moment you select ipc.
> >
> > Jon
> > _______________________________________________
> > zeromq-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> zeromq-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
