Hi

> 
> 1. From what I understand, the dependency on the DDK is only for
> development time (includes, import libs, etc.), not for runtime.
> 
> 2. I would LOVE if the "ipc://" "protocol" was supported under Windows
> with a cheap-as-possible inter-process communication protocol (named
> pipes, LPC, whatever).
> 
> --
> Gonzalo Diethelm

Maybe a bit redundant, but I have to agree. 

With OpenPGM 5 arriving for zmq, ipc support on Windows is the last major 
difference in transports between the platforms. Each difference does reduce the 
usefulness of zeromq for me as I have clients running on windows and linux 
talking to servers running on windows and linux. Not having caveats in my 
software design for ipc on windows would help me. In fact that would leave me 
with only two wishlist items (not that I am greedy I can make do most 
excellently with what we have now) :

 - reenable of IPv6 on all relevant transports (and maybe the OpenPGM 5 stuff 
helps there too), which is off according to my understanding of the issues list 
in git

 - some sort of encryption support (I am going to try to tunnel zmq through SSL 
because our data might need it, I might try and make some sort of SSL transport 
one day).

All the best,
Mikael
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Reply via email to