On 14 September 2010 12:46, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 09/14/2010 06:40 PM, Steven McCoy wrote: > > The timeout is more likely in the range milliseconds to microseconds for >> rate limiting. 0.1s can be valid for recovery. >> > > Ok, so we have 2 windows. One for "already sent stuff" (recovery buffer) > another for "stuff to be sent" (rate limiting buffer). Right? > > What's the size of the latter one then? Can it be possibly sized so that it > has rate*0.1s length? > > The latter is one sequence number in size otherwise you can get the situation that receivers are asking for re-transmission of packets that haven't been sent yet. Timer based TX flushing puts transmission time into the receiver thread for bus transports which will only be adverse for performance. -- Steve-o
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
