I don't see the point in linking statically for reducing the footprint. I'd better (and much easier) strip down libstdc with what is needed and still link it dynamically. Memory footprint is (about) the same, disk footprint a bit more, but Id expect, that other components also need libstdc.
mit freundlichen Grüßen
Sven Koebnick
---------------------------------------------------------
E = mc² ± 2dBA ----- everything is relative
---------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:56:32 +0200
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Reducing 0mq footprint...
From: Martin Sustrik <[email protected]>
To: ZeroMQ development list <[email protected]>
On 09/21/2010 04:23 PM, Joseph Stewart wrote:
> Thanks Doug... I should have expanded my search a bit outside of the 0mq
> list.
have you seen this:
http://www.trilithium.com/johan/2005/06/static-libstdc/
It looks like staically linking libstdc++ is pain, but it's at least doable.
Martin
_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
