> > I don't see the point in linking statically for reducing the footprint. I'd > better (and much easier) strip down libstdc with what is needed and still > link it dynamically. Memory footprint is (about) the same, disk footprint a > bit more, but Id expect, that other components also need libstdc.
The point isn't to remove dependencies from libstdc, but instead libstdc++. Too much heavy lifting to make a new shared libstdc++, since 0mq is the ONLY c++ app running on the box. Regards, -joe
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
