At Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:59:27 +0700, Kamil Shakirov wrote: > > Sure, system definition would be better. Here I just followed the same > > 'compile' script way. Clozure CL worked here as well. > > > > Could it be better just build only one executable image from system > definition including all examples and then pass an an example name as > the parameter to run it? Each example has its own package. > > Sounds like a more lispy way :)
I'm not sure. Image saving facility is not prescribed by ANSI, so it will induce only more hell mess. -- wbr, Vitaly _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
