On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Vitaly Mayatskikh <[email protected]> wrote: > At Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:59:27 +0700, Kamil Shakirov wrote: > >> > Sure, system definition would be better. Here I just followed the same >> > 'compile' script way. Clozure CL worked here as well. >> > >> >> Could it be better just build only one executable image from system >> definition including all examples and then pass an an example name as >> the parameter to run it? Each example has its own package. >> >> Sounds like a more lispy way :) > > I'm not sure. Image saving facility is not prescribed by ANSI, so it > will induce only more hell mess.
Ok, let's leave it as it is for now. At least examples can be compiled and run. Any improvements are welcome. :) -- --ska _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
