On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:00 PM, gonzalo diethelm <[email protected]> wrote: > #3: If we go this route, #2 would be moot. But the two behaviors are not > exactly the same. For Object, you specify a timeout of 0 if you want to wait > indefinitely, and -1 is illegal. For Poller, -1 means wait indefinitely and > 0 means “wait at most a very short time”. We would also have to define how > to deprecate Poller.[gs]etTimeout(). Ideas?
Why not have two branches of jzmq like with zmq itself? E.g. maint (tracking 0mq/maint, maven/ivy/etc version 2.0.10) and master (tracking 0mq/master, maven/ivy/etc v2.1.0). That way you could mark getTimeout/setTimeout as @Deprecated in maint and remove them in master. _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
