On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:39 PM, gonzalo diethelm <[email protected]> wrote: > Perhaps, as Martin S. suggested, we could handle this with version > numbers. Alternatively, I am not really afraid of breaking backwards > compatibility.
Backwards compatibility has been broken anyway with your recent change in Poller (you've moved the POLLIN/POLLER/etc constants to Poller), and no one complained about that. :) _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
