really? they're all master node based which doesn't scale well. what would be killer is a combination of the latest cfengine (with promise theory) and 0mq.
On Feb 24, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Ian Barber wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Pieter Hintjens <[email protected]> wrote: > Comments, sponsors, and participants welcome. As you'll see it's not a > single project but a set, many of which (like secure pub/sub) have > been discussed here many times. > > -Pieter Hintjens > iMatix > > One bit that sprang out was the node configuration management - there are > some quite good tools out there for that kind of server/service maintenance > (puppet, chef for example), and that seems like a potentially very large > chunk of complexity that maybe could be satisfied by them, at least > initially. > > Ian > _______________________________________________ > zeromq-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev ------------------ Andrew Hume (best -> Telework) +1 623-551-2845 [email protected] (Work) +1 none currently AT&T Labs - Research; member of USENIX and LOPSA
_______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
