On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Ian Barber <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, cfengine absolutely. Point being, there are good tools, and there > isn't necessarily going to be as much value in building a new one, where > there is a bigger gap for the rest of it. In terms of project work, I would > see using a 0MQ transport as part of any of those project as more something > to do with those projects than an explicit component of whaleshark. There are several aspects here. The most difficult for me is to accurately understand the problem before diving into solutions, existing or new. The second is to get 0MQ as the transport, systematically, for reasons of interoperability. So a lot of the initial work will be to make simple disposable designs that can be strawmen for real designs. -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
