On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:32, Martin Sustrik <[email protected]> wrote: >> Let's drop it unless there's someone with NT3.4 box out there to test it. > > Isn't this the kind of thing that shouldn't be done on a stable branch > (like zeromq2-1 currently)?
Good point. It depends if we consider the current Windows headers mess a bug or not. We should applying only provable bug fixes to the stable branch. In any case, if not zeromq2-1, then zeromq2-2 (and libzmq 3.0). -Pieter _______________________________________________ zeromq-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
